Rebecca Pierce‐Williams

604 total citations
8 papers, 71 citations indexed

About

Rebecca Pierce‐Williams is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca Pierce‐Williams has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 71 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 4 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in Rebecca Pierce‐Williams's work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers). Rebecca Pierce‐Williams is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers). Rebecca Pierce‐Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States and Italy. Rebecca Pierce‐Williams's co-authors include Gabriele Saccone, Vincenzo Berghella, Robert M. Ehsanipoor, Andrea Ciardulli, Neil S. Seligman, Huda B. Al‐Kouatly, Seth Berger, Isabelle Cohen, Christopher R. D’Adamo and Tomi T. Kanninen and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Pierce‐Williams

6 papers receiving 70 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rebecca Pierce‐Williams United States 3 40 35 31 28 21 8 71
Marion Fermaut France 6 61 1.5× 29 0.8× 38 1.2× 33 1.2× 30 1.4× 15 102
PE Børdahl Norway 4 27 0.7× 45 1.3× 24 0.8× 39 1.4× 18 0.9× 6 75
Chantal Ducroux-Schouwey France 3 23 0.6× 10 0.3× 21 0.7× 10 0.4× 16 0.8× 3 54
AK Jenum Norway 3 27 0.7× 31 0.9× 23 0.7× 20 0.7× 10 0.5× 8 72
Z Vilendecić Serbia 5 42 1.1× 18 0.5× 20 0.6× 14 0.5× 28 1.3× 10 80
Julia Pasquale Argentina 4 81 2.0× 18 0.5× 40 1.3× 13 0.5× 70 3.3× 8 112
Matan Elami-Suzin Israel 6 139 3.5× 17 0.5× 43 1.4× 25 0.9× 114 5.4× 11 184
Catherine A Moakes United Kingdom 6 18 0.5× 9 0.3× 25 0.8× 20 0.7× 12 0.6× 20 64
Giovanni Battista Luca Schera Italy 7 93 2.3× 17 0.5× 31 1.0× 25 0.9× 95 4.5× 13 128
Hannah Anastasio United States 5 51 1.3× 5 0.1× 31 1.0× 18 0.6× 44 2.1× 11 90

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Pierce‐Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Pierce‐Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Pierce‐Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Pierce‐Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Pierce‐Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Pierce‐Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Pierce‐Williams. The network helps show where Rebecca Pierce‐Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Pierce‐Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Pierce‐Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Pierce‐Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Pierce‐Williams. Rebecca Pierce‐Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Pierce‐Williams, Rebecca, et al.. (2022). Reminder systems to increase compliance with glucose logging in gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 4(3). 100586–100586. 4 indexed citations
2.
Pierce‐Williams, Rebecca, Henry Lesser, Isabelle Cohen, et al.. (2021). Inpatient versus outpatient transcervical Foley catheter use for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 226(1). S772–S773.
3.
Pierce‐Williams, Rebecca, et al.. (2021). Postpartum Hemorrhage in Patients with Type 1 von Willebrand Disease: A Systematic Review. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 48(2). 219–228. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kanninen, Tomi T., et al.. (2020). Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Acute Porphyria: A Systematic Literature Review [35G]. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 135(1). 80S–80S. 1 indexed citations
5.
Pierce‐Williams, Rebecca, et al.. (2020). Type 2B Von Willebrand Disease in Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review [36K]. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 135(1). 123S–123S.
6.
Pierce‐Williams, Rebecca, Gabriele Saccone, & Vincenzo Berghella. (2019). Hands-on versus hands-off techniques for the prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 34(6). 993–1001. 35 indexed citations
7.
Pierce‐Williams, Rebecca & Robert M. Ehsanipoor. (2018). Expectant Management of Early-Onset Preeclampsia With Severe Features. 38(14). 1–7. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ehsanipoor, Robert M., Gabriele Saccone, Neil S. Seligman, et al.. (2017). Intravenous fluid rate for reduction of cesarean delivery rate in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 96(7). 804–811. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026