RE BOCK

558 total citations
14 papers, 427 citations indexed

About

RE BOCK is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, RE BOCK has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 427 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 12 papers in Parasitology and 8 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in RE BOCK's work include Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (13 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (12 papers) and Viral Infections and Vectors (8 papers). RE BOCK is often cited by papers focused on Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (13 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (12 papers) and Viral Infections and Vectors (8 papers). RE BOCK collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. RE BOCK's co-authors include AJ de VOS, TG KINGSTON, GW Blight, R.J. Dalgliesh, N.N. Jonsson, Simon J. More, B.J. Rodwell and Michael McGowan and has published in prestigious journals such as Australian Veterinary Journal.

In The Last Decade

RE BOCK

14 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
RE BOCK Australia 11 365 283 220 68 65 14 427
TG KINGSTON Australia 8 308 0.8× 238 0.8× 170 0.8× 54 0.8× 50 0.8× 9 350
J. A. Lawrence Malawi 12 407 1.1× 324 1.1× 286 1.3× 74 1.1× 34 0.5× 35 485
Catherine Nkonge Kenya 7 352 1.0× 226 0.8× 177 0.8× 110 1.6× 83 1.3× 9 444
Joseph Ssebwana Katende Uganda 10 243 0.7× 206 0.7× 175 0.8× 48 0.7× 43 0.7× 25 357
F. L. Musisi United Kingdom 10 397 1.1× 304 1.1× 234 1.1× 84 1.2× 58 0.9× 27 456
J.M. Katende Kenya 9 303 0.8× 297 1.0× 217 1.0× 58 0.9× 41 0.6× 13 407
J.G.R. Ocama Kenya 9 366 1.0× 241 0.9× 155 0.7× 105 1.5× 76 1.2× 13 412
T. Molad Israel 15 512 1.4× 341 1.2× 337 1.5× 131 1.9× 59 0.9× 30 625
D.E. Radley Kenya 14 590 1.6× 458 1.6× 315 1.4× 140 2.1× 96 1.5× 18 668
B. L. Leitch Kenya 17 612 1.7× 465 1.6× 354 1.6× 183 2.7× 58 0.9× 31 709

Countries citing papers authored by RE BOCK

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of RE BOCK's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RE BOCK with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RE BOCK more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by RE BOCK

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by RE BOCK. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RE BOCK. The network helps show where RE BOCK may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of RE BOCK

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of RE BOCK. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of RE BOCK based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with RE BOCK. RE BOCK is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Jonsson, N.N., et al.. (2003). Serological evidence of exposure to tick fever organisms in young cattle on Queensland dairy farms. Australian Veterinary Journal. 81(3). 147–152. 14 indexed citations
2.
BOCK, RE & AJ de VOS. (2001). Immunity following use of Australian tick fever vaccine: a review of the evidence. Australian Veterinary Journal. 79(12). 832–839. 84 indexed citations
4.
BOCK, RE, et al.. (1999). Effect of breed of cattle on innate resistance to infection with Anaplasma marginale transmitted by Boophilus microplus. Australian Veterinary Journal. 77(11). 748–751. 17 indexed citations
5.
BOCK, RE, et al.. (1999). Effect of cattle breed on innate resistance to inoculations of Babesia bigemina. Australian Veterinary Journal. 77(7). 465–466. 18 indexed citations
7.
BOCK, RE, TG KINGSTON, & AJ de VOS. (1999). Effect of breed of cattle on transmission rate and innate resistance to infection with Babesia bovis and B bigemina transmitted by Boophilus microplus. Australian Veterinary Journal. 77(7). 461–464. 54 indexed citations
8.
BOCK, RE, et al.. (1997). Effect of breed of cattle on innate resistance to infection with <i>Babesia bovis, B bigemina and Anaplasma marginale. Australian Veterinary Journal. 75(5). 337–340. 80 indexed citations
9.
BOCK, RE, B.J. Rodwell, & Michael McGowan. (1997). Detection of calves persistently infected with bovine pestivirus in a sample of dairy calves in south‐eastern Queensland. Australian Veterinary Journal. 75(9). 656–659. 9 indexed citations
10.
BOCK, RE, et al.. (1997). Genotypic diversity in field isolates of Babesia bovis from cattle with babesiosis after vaccination. Australian Veterinary Journal. 75(8). 575–578. 28 indexed citations
11.
BOCK, RE, GW Blight, TG KINGSTON, & AJ de VOS. (1995). A survey of cattle producers in the Boophilus microplus endemic area of Queensland to determine attitudes to the control of and vaccination against tick fever. Australian Veterinary Journal. 72(3). 88–92. 14 indexed citations
12.
BOCK, RE, et al.. (1995). Studies on failure of T strain live Babesia bovis vaccine. Australian Veterinary Journal. 72(8). 296–300. 48 indexed citations
14.
BOCK, RE, et al.. (1993). Sheep‐adapted Anaplasma marginale maintains virulence for cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal. 70(5). 192–193. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026