Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Supplementary cementitious materials
20112.4k citationsBarbara Lothenbach, R.D. Hooton et al.profile →
The effect of supplementary cementitious materials on chloride binding in hardened cement paste
2011496 citationsM D Thomas, R.D. Hooton et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R.D. Hooton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.D. Hooton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.D. Hooton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.D. Hooton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.D. Hooton. The network helps show where R.D. Hooton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.D. Hooton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.D. Hooton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.D. Hooton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R.D. Hooton. R.D. Hooton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Riding, Kyle A., M D Thomas, R.D. Hooton, Karthik H. Obla, & Jason Weiss. (2018). Performance-Based Specifications for Concrete Exposed to Chlorides. ACI Concrete International. 40(7). 41–47.5 indexed citations
7.
Hooton, R.D., et al.. (2011). Mitigating Alkali-Silica Reaction when Using High-Alkali Cements. ACI Concrete International. 33(5). 34–39.1 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, M D, et al.. (2010). Field Trials of Concrete Produced with Portland Limestone Cement. ACI Concrete International. 32(1). 35–41.6 indexed citations
9.
Detwiler, Rachel J., et al.. (2010). Testing Transport Properties in Concrete: Assessing Key Indicators of Durability. ACI Concrete International. 32(11).1 indexed citations
10.
Lane, D. Stephen, Rachel J. Detwiler, & R.D. Hooton. (2010). Testing Transport Properties of Concrete. ACI Concrete International. 32(11). 33–38.5 indexed citations
Stanish, K., R.D. Hooton, & M D Thomas. (2005). The Rapid Migration Test for HPC.4 indexed citations
15.
Stanish, K., R.D. Hooton, & M D Thomas. (2005). The Rapid Migration Test—An Alternative to AASHTO T 277.1 indexed citations
16.
Detwiler, Rachel J., et al.. (2005). THE RIGHT SULFATE TEST MAKES A DIFFERENCE. ACI Concrete International. 27(2). 49–52.3 indexed citations
17.
Hooton, R.D., Mette Rica Geiker, & Evan C. Bentz. (2002). Effect of curign regimes on transport properties of mortar. ACI Materials Journal. 99(2). 201–206.20 indexed citations
18.
Hooton, R.D.. (2001). Ion and mass transport in cement-based materials.12 indexed citations
19.
Hooton, R.D., et al.. (1990). Permeability of routed Fractures in Granite. ACI Concrete International. 12(7).3 indexed citations
20.
Hooton, R.D., et al.. (1987). EVALUATION AND PREDICTION OF CONCRETE DURABILITY - ONTARIO'S HYDRO'S EXPERIENCE. CONCRETE DURABILITY. KATHERINE AND BRYANT MATHER INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, HELD AT ATLANTA, GEORGIA, USA, 27 APRIL-MAY 1987.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.