This map shows the geographic impact of Ranjit Kumar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ranjit Kumar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ranjit Kumar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ranjit Kumar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ranjit Kumar. The network helps show where Ranjit Kumar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ranjit Kumar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ranjit Kumar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ranjit Kumar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ranjit Kumar. Ranjit Kumar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Patil, S. B., et al.. (2015). Combining ability studies of pigeonpea CGMS lines with an obcordate leaf marker. Journal of Food Legumes. 28(2). 7–12.
8.
Saxena, K. B., et al.. (2013). Yield and yield attributes of hybrid pigeonpea (ICPH 2671) grown for seed purpose as influenced by plant density and irrigation. Journal of Food Legumes. 26. 46–50.1 indexed citations
9.
Saxena, K. B., et al.. (2011). Influence of spacing and irrigation on the seed yield of a CMS line ‘ICPA 2043’ of hybrid pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes. 24(3). 202–206.3 indexed citations
10.
Saxena, K. B., et al.. (2010). Response to spacing and irrigation in a medium-duration CMS-line of pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes. 23. 186–190.2 indexed citations
11.
Kumar, Ranjit, et al.. (2010). Economic analysis of adoption of zero tillage technology in wheat cultivation in trans-gangetic plains of India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 80(12). 1092–1094.1 indexed citations
12.
Saxena, K B, Ranjit Kumar, & C L L Gowda. (2010). Vegetable pigeonpea – a review. Journal of Food Legumes. 23(2). 91–98.19 indexed citations
13.
Gupta, Vinod Kumar, S. P. Ahlawat, Ranjit Kumar, Ajit, & Asis Datta. (2010). Effect of season and year on azadirachtin A and oil content in neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seeds and relationship of azadirachtin A and oil content with rainfall, temperature and humidity.. Current Science. 99(7). 953–956.11 indexed citations
Kumar, Ranjit, et al.. (2003). Rooting response in stem cuttings of Jatropha gossypiifolia.. 5. 131–133.1 indexed citations
16.
Kumar, Ranjit, Nar Singh, & R. P. Singh. (2003). Non-farm employment in rural India: An analysis of shifting paradigm. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 16. 20–30.
17.
Kumar, Ranjit & K. B. Saxena. (2001). First report of wind pollination in pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 61(3). 279–280.4 indexed citations
18.
Saxena, K B, et al.. (2000). Gene Symbols in Pigeonpea. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 53(7). 30–43.1 indexed citations
19.
Kumar, Ranjit, et al.. (1993). Rapid Multiplication of Carallia brachiata (Lour) Merr. By Terminal Branch Cuttings. Indian Forester. 119(5). 367–370.1 indexed citations
20.
Kaushik, R. A. & Ranjit Kumar. (1992). Physico chemical changes in different mango cultivars during storage. Haryana journal of horticultural sciences. 21. 166–173.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.