Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Week‐End Effect in Common Stock Returns: The International Evidence
1985537 citationsJeffrey Jaffe, Randolph WesterfieldThe Journal of Financeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Randolph Westerfield
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Randolph Westerfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Randolph Westerfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Randolph Westerfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Randolph Westerfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Randolph Westerfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Randolph Westerfield. The network helps show where Randolph Westerfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Randolph Westerfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Randolph Westerfield.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Randolph Westerfield based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Randolph Westerfield. Randolph Westerfield is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ross, Stephen A., et al.. (2015). Pengantar Keuangan Perusahaan : Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Edisi Gobal Asia Buku 1.1 indexed citations
2.
Ross, Stephen A., et al.. (2015). Pengantar Keuangan Perusahaan (Fundamentals of Corporate Finance).7 indexed citations
3.
Ross, Stephen A., Randolph Westerfield, & Bradford D. Jordan. (2009). Pengantar Keuangan Perusahaan (Buku 1).
4.
Ross, Stephen A., et al.. (2008). Solutions manual to accompany of corporate finance. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
5.
Ross, Stephen A., Randolph Westerfield, Jeffrey F. Jaffe, & Bradford D. Jordan. (2007). Core principles & applications of corporate finance.16 indexed citations
6.
Ross, Stephen A., Randolph Westerfield, Jeffrey F. Jaffe, & Bradford D. Jordan. (2007). Modern Financial Management. Medical Entomology and Zoology.107 indexed citations
7.
Ross, Stephen A., Randolph Westerfield, & Bradford D. Jordan. (2005). Corporate Finance Fundamentals. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).36 indexed citations
8.
Ross, Stephen A., Randolph Westerfield, & Jeffrey F. Jaffe. (2002). Solutions manual for use with corporate finance. McGraw-Hill eBooks.21 indexed citations
9.
Ross, Stephen A., et al.. (1997). Student Problem Manual for Use With Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
10.
Ross, Stephen A., Randolph Westerfield, & Bradford D. Jordan. (1995). Chapters from fundamentals of corporate finance : for Indiana University F301, financial management.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.