Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mucoadhesive carriers for oral drug delivery
2022126 citationsRaj Kumar, Md Nurunnabi et al.Journal of Controlled Releaseprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Raj Kumar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raj Kumar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raj Kumar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raj Kumar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raj Kumar. The network helps show where Raj Kumar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raj Kumar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raj Kumar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raj Kumar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Raj Kumar. Raj Kumar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kumar, Raj, et al.. (2019). Effect of integrated nutrient management on economic yield of cut flower of China aster (Callistephus chinensis L. Nees). International Journal of Chemical Studies. 7(1). 395–397.
10.
Kumar, Raj, et al.. (2018). Study on soil moisture pattern and soil properties in livelihood security through pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) Based intercropping under rainfed condition. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(1). 2578–2582.2 indexed citations
11.
Singh, R. P., et al.. (2018). Effect of bio-fertilizer and moisture conservation practices on growth and yield behavior of mustard under rainfed condition. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(1). 2038–2041.
12.
Sah, Rameswar Prasad, Manigopa Chakraborty, Ashwani Kumar, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of stay green induced maize hybrids for green fodder and grain yields under variable moisture regimes. Range Management and Agroforestry. 38(1). 58–64.2 indexed citations
13.
Verma, Ramesh, et al.. (2013). Prevalence of anemia in college going youths in rural blocks of a dist. of Northern India. 3(2). 15–22.5 indexed citations
14.
Saxena, K. B., Gaurav Singh, H. S. Gupta, et al.. (2011). Enhancing the livelihoods of Uttarakhand farmers by introducing pigeonpea cultivation in hilly areas. Journal of Food Legumes. 24(2). 128–132.11 indexed citations
15.
Saxena, K B, et al.. (2010). Pigeonpea - a resilient crop for the philippine drylands. Information Bulletin No. 85. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics).
16.
Kumar, Raj, et al.. (2009). Influence of soil nutrients on yield and qualitative attributes of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv Ganesh. Progressive Horticulture. 41(1). 121–123.1 indexed citations
Kumar, Raj, et al.. (2008). Oil percentage in Jatropha curcas L. germplasm of National Agroforestry Repository. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 68(4). 463–466.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.