Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images
2004467 citationsT. M. Mitchell, Rebecca Hutchinson et al.Machine Learningprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Radu Stefan Niculescu
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Radu Stefan Niculescu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Radu Stefan Niculescu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radu Stefan Niculescu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Radu Stefan Niculescu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Radu Stefan Niculescu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Radu Stefan Niculescu. The network helps show where Radu Stefan Niculescu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Radu Stefan Niculescu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Radu Stefan Niculescu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Radu Stefan Niculescu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Radu Stefan Niculescu. Radu Stefan Niculescu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Liu, Ying, et al.. (2008). Block-suffix shifting: fast, simultaneous medical concept set identification in large medical record corpora.. PubMed. 424–8.1 indexed citations
Yu, Shipeng, et al.. (2008). Large Scale Diagnostic Code Classification for Medical Patient Records. 877–882.32 indexed citations
9.
Niculescu, Radu Stefan, Tom M. Mitchell, & R. Bharat Rao. (2007). A theoretical framework for learning Bayesian networks with parameter inequality constraints. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 155–160.12 indexed citations
Rao, R. Bharat, Sriram Krishnan, & Radu Stefan Niculescu. (2006). Data mining for improved cardiac care. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 8(1). 3–10.88 indexed citations
Mitchell, Tom M. & Radu Stefan Niculescu. (2005). Exploiting parameter domain knowledge for learning in bayesian networks.10 indexed citations
15.
Mitchell, T. M., Rebecca Hutchinson, Radu Stefan Niculescu, et al.. (2004). Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images. Machine Learning. 57(1-2). 145–175.467 indexed citations breakdown →
Mitchell, Tom M., Rebecca Hutchinson, Marcel Adam Just, et al.. (2003). Machine Learning of fMRI Virtual Sensors of Cognitive States.7 indexed citations
19.
Niculescu, Radu Stefan, et al.. (2002). Mining time-dependent patient outcomes from hospital patient records.. PubMed. 632–6.9 indexed citations
20.
Niculescu, Radu Stefan, et al.. (1984). [Prognostic factors in chronic granulocytic leukemia].. PubMed. 35(5). 433–8.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.