Rachel Silverman

435 total citations
12 papers, 258 citations indexed

About

Rachel Silverman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Development. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Silverman has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 258 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 3 papers in Development. Recurrent topics in Rachel Silverman's work include Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and International Development and Aid (3 papers). Rachel Silverman is often cited by papers focused on Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and International Development and Aid (3 papers). Rachel Silverman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Rachel Silverman's co-authors include Amanda Glassman, Maciej Z. Lukawski, Jefferson W. Tester, Victoria Y. Fan, Denizhan Duran, Adrian Towse, Nandini Oomman, Garrett Mehl, Kalipso Chalkidou and Kalipso Chalkidou and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Health Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Silverman

11 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Rachel Silverman

PPCH

GHP

RESE

SR

OE

Lea Prince United States

Khaled Khatab United Kingdom

Craig Jones Australia

Lawal Amadu Nigeria

Yanli Li China

M Bhattacharya India

Cyrus Shahpar United States

Ruilin Ren China

The Sphere Project

Lea Prince United States

Rachel Silverman

42 ×0.5

PPCH

51 ×0.7

GHP

111 ×2.6

RESE

14 ×0.3

SR

3 ×0.1

OE

Citations per year, relative to Rachel Silverman Rachel Silverman (= 1×) peers Lea Prince

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Silverman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Silverman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Silverman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Silverman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Silverman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Silverman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Silverman. The network helps show where Rachel Silverman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Silverman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Silverman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Silverman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Silverman. Rachel Silverman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Towse, Adrian, et al.. (2021). How Should the World Pay for a Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Vaccine?. Value in Health. 24(5). 625–631. 11 indexed citations

2.

Chalkidou, Kalipso, et al.. (2020). Market-driven, value-based, advance commitment (MVAC): accelerating the development of a pathbreaking universal drug regimen to end TB. BMJ Global Health. 5(4). e002061–e002061. 3 indexed citations

3.

Friebel, Rocco, Rachel Silverman, Amanda Glassman, & Kalipso Chalkidou. (2019). On results reporting and evidentiary standards: spotlight on the Global Fund. The Lancet. 393(10184). 2006–2008. 7 indexed citations

4.

Glassman, Amanda, et al.. (2016). How to Get Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Right? The Case of Vaccine Economics in Latin America. Value in Health. 19(8). 913–920. 12 indexed citations

5.

Lukawski, Maciej Z., Rachel Silverman, & Jefferson W. Tester. (2016). Uncertainty analysis of geothermal well drilling and completion costs. Geothermics. 64. 382–391. 76 indexed citations

6.

Fan, Victoria Y., Amanda Glassman, & Rachel Silverman. (2014). How A New Funding Model Will Shift Allocations From The Global Fund To Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, And Malaria. Health Affairs. 33(12). 2238–2246. 10 indexed citations

7.

Oomman, Nandini, et al.. (2013). Modernising vital registration systems: why now?. The Lancet. 381(9875). 1336–1337. 12 indexed citations

8.

Fan, Victoria Y., Denizhan Duran, Rachel Silverman, & Amanda Glassman. (2013). Performance-based financing at the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: an analysis of grant ratings and funding, 2003–12. The Lancet Global Health. 1(3). e161–e168. 29 indexed citations

9.

Fan, Fan, Denizhan Duran, Rachel Silverman, & Amanda Glassman. (2013). Grant performance and payments at the Global Fund..

10.

Silverman, Rachel, et al.. (2013). The Efficacy of Interventions to Reduce Adolescent Childbearing in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Studies in Family Planning. 44(4). 369–388. 40 indexed citations

11.

Glassman, Amanda, et al.. (2012). Adolescent Fertility in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Effects and Solutions. SSRN Electronic Journal. 45 indexed citations

12.

Katz, Paul R., George W. Drach, J. Patrick O’Leary, et al.. (2009). The Jahnigen Scholars Program: A Model for Faculty Career Development. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 57(12). 2324–2327. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact