Rachel Denholm

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 796 citations indexed

About

Rachel Denholm is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Denholm has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 796 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 8 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Rachel Denholm's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). Rachel Denholm is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). Rachel Denholm collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Rachel Denholm's co-authors include Chris Salisbury, Lauren J Scott, Jeremy Horwood, Mairead Murphy, John Macleod, Andrew Turner, Anne Scott, Rhys Lewis, Leah Li and Chris Power and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, American Journal of Epidemiology and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Denholm

36 papers receiving 787 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study

2021 281 citations Mairead Murphy, Lauren J Scott et al. British Journal of General Practice profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rachel Denholm United Kingdom	14	252	214	163	118	89	38	796
Shohreh Naderimagham Iran	20	266 1.1×	270 1.3×	160 1.0×	92 0.8×	199 2.2×	66	1.1k
Zosia Kmietowicz United Kingdom	14	361 1.4×	208 1.0×	83 0.5×	142 1.2×	109 1.2×	382	1.2k
Deborah S Porterfield United States	18	410 1.6×	259 1.2×	134 0.8×	92 0.8×	206 2.3×	47	1.4k
Bidisha Nath United States	10	225 0.9×	255 1.2×	273 1.7×	80 0.7×	108 1.2×	25	759
Jane Desborough Australia	18	585 2.3×	264 1.2×	222 1.4×	147 1.2×	113 1.3×	72	1.1k
Kristen M.J. Azar United States	16	303 1.2×	251 1.2×	208 1.3×	216 1.8×	116 1.3×	53	1.3k
Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh Malaysia	18	215 0.9×	224 1.0×	105 0.6×	88 0.7×	155 1.7×	103	1.1k
Mechelle Sanders United States	16	461 1.8×	274 1.3×	278 1.7×	88 0.7×	150 1.7×	49	1.1k
Lydia R. Maurer United States	15	156 0.6×	168 0.8×	150 0.9×	44 0.4×	42 0.5×	46	861
Gemma Serral Spain	16	349 1.4×	195 0.9×	262 1.6×	86 0.7×	153 1.7×	49	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Denholm

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Denholm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Denholm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Denholm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Denholm

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Denholm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Denholm. The network helps show where Rachel Denholm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Denholm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Denholm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Denholm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Denholm. Rachel Denholm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Karthikeyan, Arun S, Rachel Denholm, Sonya V. Babu‐Narayan, et al.. (2025). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: prospective cohort analyses of 26 270 procedures in 17 860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data. Open Heart. 12(1). e003054–e003054. 1 indexed citations

Keene, Spencer, Hoda Abbasizanjani, Fatemeh Torabi, et al.. (2024). Risks of major arterial and venous thrombotic diseases after hospitalisation for influenza, pneumonia, and COVID-19: A population-wide cohort in 2.6 million people in Wales. Thrombosis Research. 245. 109213–109213. 6 indexed citations

Baxter, Helen, Lindsay Bearne, Tracey Stone, et al.. (2024). The effectiveness of knowledge-sharing techniques and approaches in research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR): a systematic review. Health Research Policy and Systems. 22(1). 41–41. 2 indexed citations

Horne, Elsie, William Hulme, Edward P K Parker, et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines as First Booster Doses in England: An Observational Study in OpenSAFELY-TPP. Epidemiology. 35(4). 568–578. 1 indexed citations

Ip, Samantha, Teri-Louise North, Fatemeh Torabi, et al.. (2024). Cohort study of cardiovascular safety of different COVID-19 vaccination doses among 46 million adults in England. Nature Communications. 15(1). 6085–6085. 7 indexed citations

Raffetti, Elena, Thomas Bolton, Luisa Zuccolo, et al.. (2024). COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccination during pregnancy, and adverse pregnancy outcomes of 865,654 women in England and Wales: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 45. 101037–101037. 5 indexed citations

Pickett, James, Darren M. Ashcroft, Hajira Dambha‐Miller, et al.. (2023). UK research data resources based on primary care electronic health records: review and summary for potential users. BJGP Open. 7(3). BJGPO.2023.0057–BJGPO.2023.0057. 4 indexed citations

James, Charlotte, Richard M. Wood, & Rachel Denholm. (2023). A multi-granular stacked regression for forecasting long-term demand in Emergency Departments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 23(1). 29–29. 1 indexed citations

Whiteley, William, Samantha Ip, Jennifer Cooper, et al.. (2022). Association of COVID-19 vaccines ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 with major venous, arterial, or thrombocytopenic events: A population-based cohort study of 46 million adults in England. PLoS Medicine. 19(2). e1003926–e1003926. 51 indexed citations

10.

Togawa, Kayo, Maria E. Leon, Pierre Lebailly, et al.. (2021). Cancer incidence in agricultural workers: Findings from an international consortium of agricultural cohort studies (AGRICOH). Environment International. 157. 106825–106825. 40 indexed citations

11.

Wood, Angela, Rachel Denholm, Sam Hollings, et al.. (2021). Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource. BMJ. 373. n826–n826. 93 indexed citations

12.

Scott, Lauren J, Mairead Murphy, S.J. Price, et al.. (2021). Changes in presentations with features potentially indicating cancer in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 11(5). e050131–e050131. 7 indexed citations

13.

McCahon, Deborah, Rachel Denholm, Alyson Huntley, et al.. (2021). Development of a model of medication review for use in clinical practice: Bristol medication review model. BMC Medicine. 19(1). 262–262. 13 indexed citations

14.

Murphy, Mairead, Lauren J Scott, Chris Salisbury, et al.. (2021). Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. British Journal of General Practice. 71(704). e166–e177. 281 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Denholm, Rachel, Esther van der Werf, & Alastair D Hay. (2020). Use of antibiotics and asthma medication for acute lower respiratory tract infections in people with and without asthma: retrospective cohort study. Respiratory Research. 21(1). 4–4. 10 indexed citations

16.

Mansfield, Kathryn E., Rachel Denholm, Jennifer K Quint, et al.. (2019). Completeness and validity of alcohol recording in general practice within the UK: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 9(11). e031537–e031537. 21 indexed citations

17.

Denholm, Rachel, Bianca De Stavola, John H. Hipwell, et al.. (2018). Circulating Growth and Sex Hormone Levels and Breast Tissue Composition in Young Nulliparous Women. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 27(12). 1500–1508. 5 indexed citations

18.

Denholm, Rachel, et al.. (2017). Asthma and lung cancer, after accounting for co-occurring respiratory diseases and allergic conditions: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 7(1). e013637–e013637. 6 indexed citations

19.

Eng, Amanda, Rachel Denholm, Mitch Dowsett, et al.. (2016). Impact of type of full-field digital image on mammographic density assessment and breast cancer risk estimation: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Research. 18(1). 96–96. 11 indexed citations

20.

Denholm, Rachel, et al.. (2016). Environmental carcinogen exposure and lifestyle factors affecting cancer risk in Qatar: findings from a qualitative review. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 22(3). 219–227. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact