Rachel Cleetus

436 total citations
11 papers, 284 citations indexed

About

Rachel Cleetus is a scholar working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Economics and Econometrics and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Cleetus has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 284 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Rachel Cleetus's work include Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (5 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers). Rachel Cleetus is often cited by papers focused on Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (5 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers). Rachel Cleetus collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Rachel Cleetus's co-authors include Astrid Caldas, Erika Spanger‐Siegfried, Kristina Dahl, Juan Declet‐Barreto, Rachel Licker, J. Pablo Ortiz‐Partida, Shuchi Talati, Carly Phillips, Christopher H. Trisos and Colin J. Carlson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Climate Change, Environmental Research Letters and The Electricity Journal.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Cleetus

9 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Cleetus United States 6 111 86 65 51 28 11 284
Shuchi Talati United States 9 193 1.7× 139 1.6× 104 1.6× 57 1.1× 28 1.0× 14 436
Muhammad Jawed Iqbal Pakistan 8 87 0.8× 41 0.5× 48 0.7× 22 0.4× 60 2.1× 27 305
Soheil Shayegh Italy 13 98 0.9× 106 1.2× 196 3.0× 71 1.4× 15 0.5× 30 511
Sarpong Hammond Antwi Ireland 7 109 1.0× 51 0.6× 82 1.3× 15 0.3× 20 0.7× 13 260
Martha Macêdo de Lima Barata Brazil 10 97 0.9× 61 0.7× 39 0.6× 62 1.2× 4 0.1× 22 370
Noura Al Nasiri Oman 14 163 1.5× 30 0.3× 45 0.7× 104 2.0× 35 1.3× 26 441
Sara Lærke Meltofte Trærup Denmark 9 73 0.7× 55 0.6× 55 0.8× 30 0.6× 11 0.4× 19 276
Jorge Gómez‐Paredes Japan 4 61 0.5× 44 0.5× 103 1.6× 31 0.6× 43 1.5× 5 299
Valoree S. Gagnon United States 10 94 0.8× 71 0.8× 34 0.5× 30 0.6× 5 0.2× 22 319

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Cleetus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Cleetus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Cleetus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Cleetus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Cleetus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Cleetus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Cleetus. The network helps show where Rachel Cleetus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Cleetus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Cleetus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Cleetus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Cleetus. Rachel Cleetus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Phillips, Carly, Astrid Caldas, Rachel Cleetus, et al.. (2020). Compound climate risks in the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Climate Change. 10(7). 586–588. 200 indexed citations
2.
Dahl, Kristina, Erika Spanger‐Siegfried, Rachel Licker, et al.. (2019). Killer heat in the United States: climate choices and the future of dangerously hot days. 10 indexed citations
3.
Spanger‐Siegfried, Erika, et al.. (2017). When Rising Seas Hit Home: Hard Choices Ahead for Hundreds of US Coastal Communities. 15 indexed citations
4.
Clemmer, Steve, et al.. (2016). Capitalizing on the Clean Power Plan and renewable energy tax credits. The Electricity Journal. 29(6). 15–21. 4 indexed citations
5.
Cleetus, Rachel, et al.. (2015). Head Start: Most States Already on Track to Meet Targets in Proposed Clean Power Plan. The Electricity Journal. 28(7). 136–143. 2 indexed citations
6.
Revesz, Richard L., Nathaniel O. Keohane, Rachel Cleetus, et al.. (2014). Comments on the U.S. Social Cost of Carbon. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University).
7.
Cleetus, Rachel, et al.. (2014). Economic impacts on West Virginia from projected future coal production and implications for policymakers. Environmental Research Letters. 9(2). 24006–24006. 7 indexed citations
8.
Clemmer, Steve, et al.. (2014). Strengthening the EPA's Clean Power Plan by Increasing the Contribution from Renewable Energy. The Electricity Journal. 27(10). 93–102. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cleetus, Rachel, et al.. (2013). Ripe for Retirement: An Economic Analysis of the U.S. Coal Fleet. The Electricity Journal. 26(10). 51–63. 31 indexed citations
10.
Cleetus, Rachel. (2011). Finding common ground in the debate between carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 67(1). 19–27. 2 indexed citations
11.
Cleetus, Rachel, et al.. (2010). Climate 2030 : A National Blueprint for a Clean Energy Economy. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026