Rachel Baum

706 total citations
11 papers, 524 citations indexed

About

Rachel Baum is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Baum has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 524 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Rachel Baum's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). Rachel Baum is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). Rachel Baum collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Rachel Baum's co-authors include Charles W. Taylor, Lynn C. Yeoman, Mark O. J. Olson, Archie W. Prestayko, H. Busch, Ira L. Goldknopf, Adam M. Schmitt, Alexander Y. Payumo, Tiffany Hung and Daniela Kenzelmann Brož and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Baum

11 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Rachel Baum

GENET

ONCOL

PHEOH

Anjali D. Zimmer United States

Karolina Pesz Poland

Shannon Healy Canada

Anne-Laure Vitte France

Margaret Bryans United States

Maria João Silva Australia

Satish Sati India

Emily He United States

Robert Aboukhalil United States

Xinliang Zhao United States

Anjali D. Zimmer United States

Rachel Baum

305 ×0.7

78 ×0.4

207 ×4.2

GENET

36 ×0.8

ONCOL

23 ×0.7

PHEOH

Citations per year, relative to Rachel Baum Rachel Baum (= 1×) peers Anjali D. Zimmer

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Baum

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Baum

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Baum. The network helps show where Rachel Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Baum. Rachel Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Marney, Christina B, Erik S. Anderson, Rachel Baum, & Adam M. Schmitt. (2022). A Unique Spectrum of Spontaneous Tumors in Dino Knockout Mice Identifies Tissue-Specific Requirements for Tumor Suppression. Cells. 11(11). 1818–1818. 5 indexed citations

Peng, Kai-Lin, Harish N. Vasudevan, Rachel Baum, et al.. (2022). Miat and interacting protein Metadherin maintain a stem-like niche to promote medulloblastoma tumorigenesis and treatment resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(37). e2203738119–e2203738119. 13 indexed citations

McGlincy, Nicholas J., et al.. (2021). A genome-scale CRISPR interference guide library enables comprehensive phenotypic profiling in yeast. BMC Genomics. 22(1). 205–205. 30 indexed citations

Bredeson, Jessen V., et al.. (2020). Analysis of muntjac deer genome and chromatin architecture reveals rapid karyotype evolution. Communications Biology. 3(1). 480–480. 33 indexed citations

Garbers, Samantha, et al.. (2019). “If You Don't Ask, I'm Not Going to Tell You”: Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Inform Pregnancy Intention Screening Processes for Black and Latina Women in Primary Care. Women s Health Issues. 30(1). 25–34. 10 indexed citations

Baum, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Primary care providers’ responses to pregnancy intention screening challenges: community-based participatory research at an urban community health centre. Family Practice. 36(6). 797–803. 5 indexed citations

Baum, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Building Community Capacity for Qualitative Research to Improve Pregnancy Intention Screening. Progress in community health partnerships. 13(4). 411–426. 3 indexed citations

Schmitt, Adam M., Julia T. Garcia, Tiffany Hung, et al.. (2016). An inducible long noncoding RNA amplifies DNA damage signaling. Nature Genetics. 48(11). 1370–1376. 183 indexed citations

Garbers, Samantha, et al.. (2014). “Get It and Forget It:” online evaluation of a theory-based IUD educational video in English and Spanish. Contraception. 91(1). 76–79. 14 indexed citations

10.

Mattes, Malcolm D., et al.. (2014). Understanding the Views of Those Who Care for Patients With Cancer on Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Care. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®. 32(8). 802–809. 12 indexed citations

11.

Goldknopf, Ira L., Charles W. Taylor, Rachel Baum, et al.. (1975). Isolation and characterization of protein A24, a "histone-like" non-histone chromosomal protein.. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 250(18). 7182–7187. 216 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact