R. W. Stoughton

1.2k total citations
56 papers, 764 citations indexed

About

R. W. Stoughton is a scholar working on Filtration and Separation, Radiation and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, R. W. Stoughton has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 764 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Filtration and Separation, 16 papers in Radiation and 15 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in R. W. Stoughton's work include Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (23 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (9 papers). R. W. Stoughton is often cited by papers focused on Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (23 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (9 papers). R. W. Stoughton collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. R. W. Stoughton's co-authors include M. H. Lietzke, J. Halperin, T. F. Young, B. H. Ketelle, W.T. Smith, G. D. O’Kelley, Raymond M. Fuoss, Francis J. Johnston, H. W. Schmitt and M. Tobias and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

In The Last Decade

R. W. Stoughton

55 papers receiving 702 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. W. Stoughton United States 16 350 234 177 142 111 56 764
Cecil V. King United States 10 94 0.3× 221 0.9× 86 0.5× 13 0.1× 38 0.3× 30 978
N. H. Sagert Canada 15 60 0.2× 169 0.7× 48 0.3× 25 0.2× 24 0.2× 55 586
M. D. Danford United States 14 94 0.3× 397 1.7× 209 1.2× 24 0.2× 13 0.1× 33 938
Dorota Światła-Wójcik Poland 16 123 0.4× 152 0.6× 152 0.9× 13 0.1× 33 0.3× 47 716
K. Tödheide Germany 15 81 0.2× 182 0.8× 214 1.2× 25 0.2× 14 0.1× 40 956
F. David France 14 89 0.3× 339 1.4× 40 0.2× 16 0.1× 20 0.2× 49 806
S. W. Mayer United States 14 34 0.1× 222 0.9× 139 0.8× 9 0.1× 50 0.5× 37 695
C.F. Coleman United States 16 172 0.5× 193 0.8× 47 0.3× 29 0.2× 4 0.0× 41 1.2k
C. Gumiński Poland 15 66 0.2× 241 1.0× 30 0.2× 15 0.1× 24 0.2× 78 585
Alexandre Ruas France 13 153 0.4× 118 0.5× 65 0.4× 59 0.4× 10 0.1× 30 533

Countries citing papers authored by R. W. Stoughton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. W. Stoughton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. W. Stoughton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. W. Stoughton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. W. Stoughton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. W. Stoughton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. W. Stoughton. The network helps show where R. W. Stoughton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. W. Stoughton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. W. Stoughton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. W. Stoughton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. W. Stoughton. R. W. Stoughton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Halperin, J., C. E. Bemis, J. W. T. Dabbs, et al.. (1980). Prompt Neutron Multiplicity Distribution in the Spontaneous Fission of Curium-242. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 75(1). 56–59. 1 indexed citations
2.
Stoughton, R. W., J. Halperin, J. S. Drury, et al.. (1973). A Search for Naturally Occurring Superheavy Elements. Nature Physical Science. 246(150). 26–28. 8 indexed citations
3.
Macklin, R. L., et al.. (1972). Neutron multiplicity counter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 102(1). 181–187. 19 indexed citations
4.
Lietzke, M. H. & R. W. Stoughton. (1972). A simple empirical equation for the prediction of the activity-coefficient value of each component in aqueous electrolyte mixtures containing a common ion. Journal of Solution Chemistry. 1(4). 299–308. 49 indexed citations
5.
Lietzke, M. H., R. W. Stoughton, & Raymond M. Fuoss. (1968). A TWO-STRUCTURE MODEL FOR ELECTROLYTIC SOLUTIONS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 59(1). 39–45. 15 indexed citations
6.
Stoughton, R. W.. (1965). Solutions of Electrolytes. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 16(1). 297–320. 6 indexed citations
7.
Stoughton, R. W., et al.. (1964). A comparison of several methods for inverting large symmetric positive definite matrices. Mathematics of Computation. 18(87). 449–456. 8 indexed citations
8.
Lietzke, M. H. & R. W. Stoughton. (1964). Electromotive Force Studies in Aqueous Solutions at Elevated Temperatures. V. The Thermodynamic Properties of DCI Solutions1. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 68(10). 3043–3048. 12 indexed citations
9.
Halperin, J., et al.. (1963). The Average Capture/Fission Ratio of U233for Epithermal Neutrons. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 16(2). 245–247. 4 indexed citations
10.
Stoughton, R. W. & J. Halperin. (1963). Effective Cutoff Energies for Boron, Cadmium, Gadolinium, and Samarium Filters. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 15(3). 314–324. 21 indexed citations
11.
Lietzke, M. H. & R. W. Stoughton. (1962). THE CALCULATION OF ACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS FROM OSMOTIC COEFFICIENT DATA1. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 66(3). 508–509. 61 indexed citations
12.
Stoughton, R. W., et al.. (1961). A study of thorium-iodate complexing in aqueous solutions. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry. 19(3-4). 286–297. 1 indexed citations
13.
Lietzke, M. H. & R. W. Stoughton. (1960). THE SOLUBILITY OF SILVER SULFATE IN ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS. PART 7. SOLUBILITY IN URANYL SULFATE SOLUTIONS1. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 64(6). 816–820. 22 indexed citations
14.
Smith, W.T., et al.. (1960). ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE MEASUREMENTS IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES. II. THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF HYDROCHLORIC ACID1. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 64(10). 1445–1448. 33 indexed citations
15.
Stoughton, R. W. & M. H. Lietzke. (1960). THE SOLUBILITY OF SILVER SULFATE IN ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS. PART 6. HEATS AND ENTROPIES OF SOLUTION vs. TEMPERATURE. SPECIES PRESENT IN HNO3 AND H2SO4 MEDIA1. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 64(1). 133–136. 8 indexed citations
16.
Johnston, Francis J., J. Halperin, & R. W. Stoughton. (1960). The thermal neutron absorption cross-section of 233Th and the resonance integrals of 232Th, 233Th and 59Co. 11(2-4). 95–100. 9 indexed citations
17.
Lietzke, M. H. & R. W. Stoughton. (1957). Feasible Chemical Forms for Thorium Breeder Blanket. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 49(2). 202–207. 1 indexed citations
18.
Halperin, J., et al.. (1956). An Effective Capture Cross Section of Np239 for Thermal Reactor Neutrons. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 1(2). 108–111. 2 indexed citations
19.
Halperin, J., et al.. (1956). Effective Capture Cross Section of Pa-233 for Thermal Reactor Neutrons. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 1(1). 1–3. 7 indexed citations
20.
Stoughton, R. W., et al.. (1952). Chemistry of Thorium in Aqueous Solutions. II. Chloride Complexing as A Function of Ionic Strength. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 56(1). 1–5. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026