R. W. RUSH

815 total citations
10 papers, 628 citations indexed

About

R. W. RUSH is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. W. RUSH has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 628 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in R. W. RUSH's work include Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers). R. W. RUSH is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers). R. W. RUSH collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. R. W. RUSH's co-authors include A. C. Turnbull, Anne B. M. Anderson, Marc J. N. C. Keirse, J D Baum, P Howat, Iain Chalmers, Adrian Grant, Sedick Isaacs, Lesley Jones and Klim McPherson and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Oncology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

In The Last Decade

R. W. RUSH

9 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. W. RUSH United Kingdom 8 378 266 224 216 148 10 628
J OWEN United States 14 215 0.6× 158 0.6× 409 1.8× 158 0.7× 221 1.5× 17 657
Cynthia G. Brumfield United States 15 282 0.7× 232 0.9× 365 1.6× 178 0.8× 300 2.0× 36 772
J CRANE Canada 12 478 1.3× 415 1.6× 248 1.1× 66 0.3× 310 2.1× 17 764
Boris Furman Israel 17 129 0.3× 203 0.8× 501 2.2× 171 0.8× 404 2.7× 32 762
Gregory J. Locksmith United States 10 270 0.7× 251 0.9× 119 0.5× 85 0.4× 170 1.1× 21 499
John W. Goldkrand United States 12 143 0.4× 131 0.5× 166 0.7× 57 0.3× 165 1.1× 26 394
Paul J. Weinbaum United States 15 239 0.6× 190 0.7× 376 1.7× 206 1.0× 265 1.8× 29 733
Calla Holmgren United States 15 193 0.5× 337 1.3× 484 2.2× 145 0.7× 480 3.2× 31 758
Stewart H. Clifford United States 7 91 0.2× 86 0.3× 213 1.0× 118 0.5× 152 1.0× 17 499
Robert M. Ehsanipoor United States 13 257 0.7× 223 0.8× 162 0.7× 71 0.3× 221 1.5× 29 530

Countries citing papers authored by R. W. RUSH

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. W. RUSH's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. W. RUSH with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. W. RUSH more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. W. RUSH

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. W. RUSH. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. W. RUSH. The network helps show where R. W. RUSH may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. W. RUSH

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. W. RUSH. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. W. RUSH based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. W. RUSH. R. W. RUSH is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Storey, D., Rachel Waters, C. Hibberd, et al.. (2007). Clinically relevant fatigue in cancer outpatients: the Edinburgh Cancer Centre symptom study. Annals of Oncology. 18(11). 1861–1869. 54 indexed citations
2.
Anthony, John & R. W. RUSH. (1998). A randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 105(7). 810–810. 2 indexed citations
3.
RUSH, R. W., et al.. (1985). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cervical Cerclage in Women at High Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 40(4). 230–230. 8 indexed citations
4.
RUSH, R. W., Sedick Isaacs, Klim McPherson, et al.. (1984). A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 91(8). 724–730. 179 indexed citations
5.
RUSH, R. W.. (1980). The management of preterm rupture of the membranes.. PubMed. 58(17). 690–1.
6.
RUSH, R. W., et al.. (1979). Incidence of heart disease in pregnancy. A study done at Peninsula Maternity Services hospitals.. PubMed. 55(20). 808–10. 8 indexed citations
7.
RUSH, R. W., et al.. (1978). THE EFFECT OF PRETERM DELIVERY ON PERINATAL MORTALITY. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 85(11). 806–811. 31 indexed citations
8.
Keirse, Marc J. N. C., R. W. RUSH, Anne B. M. Anderson, & A. C. Turnbull. (1978). RISK OF PRE‐TERM DELIVERY IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS PRE‐TERM DELIVERY AND/OR ABORTION. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 85(2). 81–85. 60 indexed citations
9.
RUSH, R. W., Marc J.N.C. Keirse, P Howat, et al.. (1977). CONTRIBUTION OF PRETERM DELIVERY TO PERINATAL MORTALITY. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 32(10). 643–645. 22 indexed citations
10.
RUSH, R. W., Marc J. N. C. Keirse, P Howat, et al.. (1976). Contribution of preterm delivery to perinatal mortality.. BMJ. 2(6042). 965–968. 264 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026