R. van Berloo
- Plant Science top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 10%
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- P. StamRonald C. B. HuttenRichard G. F. VisserP. LindhoutHerman J. van EckJ.A.L. van KanArjen ten HaveArnaud Bovy
- Topics
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (10 papers)Genetics and Plant Breeding (9 papers)Plant Pathogens and Resistance (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Plant ScienceGeneticsHorticulture
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsArgentinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
R. van Berloo
21 papers receiving 930 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Plant Science 889
- Genetics 385
- Molecular Biology 145
- Food Science 75
- Cell Biology 72
Countries citing papers authored by R. van Berloo
This map shows the geographic impact of R. van Berloo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. van Berloo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. van Berloo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. van Berloo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. van Berloo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. van Berloo. The network helps show where R. van Berloo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. van Berloo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. van Berloo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. van Berloo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. van Berloo. R. van Berloo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 305 | |
| 4 | 65 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 78 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | Mapping disease resistance genes in tomato | 5 |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | Use of molecular markers in plant breeding. | 7 |
| 17 | Near-isogenic Lines for Quantitative Genes for Partial Resistance against Barley Leaf Rust (Puccinia Hordei)in Cultivated Barley | 1 |
| 18 | 145 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | MapQTL Assistant: a user-friendly shell round MapQTL®. | 1 |
About R. van Berloo
R. van Berloo is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics and Food Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (10 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (9 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (889 citations), Genetics (385 citations) and Horticulture (7 citations). R. van Berloo has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Argentina and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Stam, Ronald C. B. Hutten, Richard G. F. Visser, P. Lindhout, Herman J. van Eck, J.A.L. van Kan, Arjen ten Have, Arnaud Bovy, Fred A. van Eeuwijk and Yury Tikunov. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Plant Science and BMC Plant Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.