R. Scott Benson

503 total citations
8 papers, 291 citations indexed

About

R. Scott Benson is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Scott Benson has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 291 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in R. Scott Benson's work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). R. Scott Benson is often cited by papers focused on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). R. Scott Benson collaborates with scholars based in United States. R. Scott Benson's co-authors include Boris Birmaher, David A. Brent, Saundra Stock, Arthur Garson, Neil W. Boris, Christopher Bellonci, Oscar G. Bukstein, Regina Bussing, Matthew Siegel and Charles H. Zeanah and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Child Psychiatry & Human Development.

In The Last Decade

R. Scott Benson

7 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Scott Benson United States 5 182 115 55 42 36 8 291
Cyril Dalais United States 4 124 0.7× 66 0.6× 28 0.5× 30 0.7× 40 1.1× 4 297
Pernille Darling Rasmussen Denmark 8 187 1.0× 127 1.1× 30 0.5× 18 0.4× 75 2.1× 20 290
Ana A. Rivas-Vazquez United States 6 201 1.1× 60 0.5× 23 0.4× 24 0.6× 93 2.6× 14 285
Fang‐Ju Tsai Taiwan 9 182 1.0× 73 0.6× 43 0.8× 8 0.2× 57 1.6× 9 302
Nathalie Franc France 8 140 0.8× 106 0.9× 65 1.2× 7 0.2× 45 1.3× 22 282
Donna Downing United States 10 290 1.6× 236 2.1× 47 0.9× 13 0.3× 134 3.7× 13 424
Jennifer West United States 5 275 1.5× 47 0.4× 16 0.3× 32 0.8× 65 1.8× 8 382
Nobuaki Morita Japan 11 151 0.8× 53 0.5× 22 0.4× 8 0.2× 67 1.9× 58 342
Nicole C. Rushing United States 10 202 1.1× 100 0.9× 34 0.6× 6 0.1× 53 1.5× 11 376
Omar Almodayfer Sweden 10 168 0.9× 230 2.0× 26 0.5× 34 0.8× 10 0.3× 12 398

Countries citing papers authored by R. Scott Benson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Scott Benson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Scott Benson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Scott Benson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Scott Benson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Scott Benson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Scott Benson. The network helps show where R. Scott Benson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Scott Benson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Scott Benson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Scott Benson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Scott Benson. R. Scott Benson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Frank‐Crawford, Michelle A., et al.. (2025). Application of the augmented competing stimulus assessment to identify and establish competing self‐restraint items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 59(1). e70040–e70040.
2.
Frank‐Crawford, Michelle A., et al.. (2024). Examining patterns suggestive of acquisition during functional analyses: A consecutive controlled series of 116 cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 57(2). 426–443. 3 indexed citations
3.
Falligant, John Michael, et al.. (2024). Further evidence of renewal in automatically maintained behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 57(2). 490–501. 4 indexed citations
4.
Zeanah, Charles H., Neil W. Boris, Henrik Walter, et al.. (2016). Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Reactive Attachment Disorder and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 55(11). 990–1003. 65 indexed citations
5.
Greenhill, Laurence L., Steven R. Pliszka, Mina K. Dulcan, et al.. (2004). Practice Parameter for the Use of Stimulant Medications in the Treatment of Children, Adolescents, and Adults. FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry. 2(4). 642–668. 33 indexed citations
6.
Birmaher, Boris, David A. Brent, & R. Scott Benson. (1998). Summary of the Practice Parameters for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Depressive Disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 37(11). 1234–1238. 142 indexed citations
7.
Garson, Arthur, et al.. (1978). Parental reactions to children with congenital heart disease. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 9(2). 86–94. 29 indexed citations
8.
Benson, R. Scott. (1975). The forgotten treatment modality in bipolar illness: psychotherapy.. PubMed. 36(11). 634–8. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026