Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Dynamics of the quiescent solar corona
1978903 citationsR. Rosner, G. S. Vaiana et al.profile →
Results from an extensive Einstein stellar survey
1981181 citationsG. S. Vaiana, R. Giacconi et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Rosner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Rosner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Rosner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Rosner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Rosner. The network helps show where R. Rosner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Rosner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Rosner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Rosner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Rosner. R. Rosner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McMullin, J. P., Thomas Rimmelé, M. Warner, et al.. (2016). Construction Status and Early Science with the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope.1 indexed citations
Zingale, M., F. X. Timmes, B. Fryxell, et al.. (2000). Helium Detonations on Neutron Stars. 196.1 indexed citations
13.
Moore, Ronald L., Z. E. Musielak, C. H. An, R. Rosner, & S. T. Suess. (1991). Why the Winds from Late-Type Giants and Supergiants are Cool. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 23. 1385.
14.
Schmitt, J. H. M. M., et al.. (1984). X-ray Spectra of RS CVn Binaries. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 16. 514.
15.
Bookbinder, Jay A., J. H. M. M. Schmitt, L. Golub, & R. Rosner. (1984). An X-ray Survey of Late-Type Dwarf Stars. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 16. 515.1 indexed citations
16.
Habbal, S. R., K. Tsinganos, & R. Rosner. (1983). Multiple transonic solutions and a new class of shock transitions in solar and stellar winds. 228.1 indexed citations
17.
Tsinganos, K., S. R. Habbal, & R. Rosner. (1983). Formation of standing shocks in stellar winds and related astrophysical flows. 228.1 indexed citations
18.
Rosner, R.. (1980). Stellar Coronae - Interpretation and Modeling of Stellar Activity. 389. 79.1 indexed citations
19.
Vaiana, G. S., W. Forman, R. Giacconi, et al.. (1979). Initial Results from the Einstein Survey of Stellar Low-Luminosity X-ray Sources. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 11. 446.
20.
Vaiana, G. S., B. Coppi, L. Golub, & R. Rosner. (1977). Heating of Coronal Plasma by Anomalous Current Dissipation.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 9. 370.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.