This map shows the geographic impact of R. Raymond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Raymond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Raymond more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Raymond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Raymond. The network helps show where R. Raymond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Raymond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Raymond.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Raymond based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Raymond. R. Raymond is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Raymond, R., Steven L. Reneau, & Charles D. Harrington. (1991). Elemental Relationships in Rock Varnish as Seen with Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Elemental Line Profiling. Scanning microscopy. 5(1). 37–46.13 indexed citations
Reneau, Steven L., R.C. Hagan, Charles D. Harrington, & R. Raymond. (1990). Scanning electron microscopic analysis of rock varnish chemistry for cation-ratio dating : an examination of electron beam penetration depths. Scanning microscopy. 5(1). 47–54.5 indexed citations
Raymond, R., Arthur D. Cohen, & D. L. Bish. (1985). Ash contents of Costa Rican peat deposits. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).2 indexed citations
10.
Raymond, R., et al.. (1985). Economic characteristics of the peat deposits of Costa Rica: preliminary study. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).2 indexed citations
11.
Gladney, Ernest S., R. Raymond, & Nathan W. Bower. (1985). Analyzer for the determination of sulfur in coals and peats. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
12.
Raymond, R., et al.. (1983). Mineral matter in peat: its occurrence, form, and distribution.34 indexed citations
13.
Raymond, R.. (1981). Rapid, direct determination of organic sulfur in coal using electron-probe microanalysis. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
Reggel, Leslie, et al.. (1976). Preparation of ash-free, pyrite-free coal by mild chemical treatment.4 indexed citations
16.
Reggel, Leslie, et al.. (1976). Removal of mineral matter including pyrite from coal. [3 claims]. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).3 indexed citations
Morgan, David, et al.. (1973). LABORATORY TEST RESULTS, LOW EMISSION RANKING-CYCLE ENGINE WITH ORGANIC-BASED WORKING FLUID AND RECIPROCATING EXPANDER FOR AUTOMOBILES. Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.10 indexed citations
Morgan, David & R. Raymond. (1970). Conceptual design. Rankine-cycle power system with organic working fluid and reciprocating engine for passenger vehicles. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.