R. M. Wright

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

R. M. Wright is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, R. M. Wright has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 9 papers in Radiation and 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in R. M. Wright's work include Nuclear physics research studies (9 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers). R. M. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (9 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers). R. M. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, Poland and Australia. R. M. Wright's co-authors include Richard A. Arndt, Malcolm H. MacGregor, L. David Roper, Bernard T. Feld, Leigh Hargreaves, Mark C. Zammit, Dmitry V. Fursa, Jeremy Savage, Igor Bray and M. A. Khakoo and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics.

In The Last Decade

R. M. Wright

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Matrix. X... 1969 2026 1988 2007 1969 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. M. Wright United States 10 888 349 236 150 84 20 1.1k
K. E. Lassila United States 16 820 0.9× 432 1.2× 203 0.9× 172 1.1× 44 0.5× 56 1.1k
A.S. Clough United Kingdom 23 1.1k 1.2× 401 1.1× 462 2.0× 180 1.2× 76 0.9× 53 1.4k
J.M. Cameron Canada 22 1.1k 1.3× 519 1.5× 423 1.8× 153 1.0× 74 0.9× 88 1.4k
Thomas Ypsilantis United States 13 711 0.8× 397 1.1× 214 0.9× 143 1.0× 46 0.5× 26 988
S. Platchkov France 19 1.2k 1.3× 579 1.7× 233 1.0× 144 1.0× 63 0.8× 53 1.3k
G.G. Simon Germany 12 1.1k 1.3× 478 1.4× 138 0.6× 83 0.6× 48 0.6× 17 1.4k
E. Jans Netherlands 16 1.0k 1.2× 526 1.5× 188 0.8× 129 0.9× 56 0.7× 41 1.2k
J.M. Cavedon France 22 1.3k 1.5× 662 1.9× 241 1.0× 176 1.2× 81 1.0× 35 1.5k
J. Duflo France 19 1.0k 1.2× 264 0.8× 230 1.0× 118 0.8× 44 0.5× 44 1.2k
A. Chaumeaux France 21 1.4k 1.5× 493 1.4× 321 1.4× 209 1.4× 86 1.0× 36 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by R. M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. M. Wright. The network helps show where R. M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. M. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. M. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. M. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. M. Wright. R. M. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wright, R. M., Leigh Hargreaves, Dmitry V. Fursa, et al.. (2018). Time-of-flight electron scattering from molecular hydrogen: Benchmark cross sections for excitation of the X1Σg+b3Σu+ transition. Physical review. A. 97(5). 16 indexed citations
2.
Fursa, Dmitry V., Liam H. Scarlett, Jeremy Savage, et al.. (2018). Electron-impact dissociation of molecular hydrogen: Benchmark cross sections. eSpace (Curtin University). 1724–1727. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wright, R. M., Leigh Hargreaves, Dmitry V. Fursa, et al.. (2018). Low-energy electron scattering from molecular hydrogen: Excitation of the X1Σg+ to b3Σu+ transition. Physical review. A. 98(6). 16 indexed citations
5.
Hargreaves, Leigh, R. M. Wright, M. A. Khakoo, et al.. (2015). Polarization correlations for electron-impact excitation of neon at 50 eV. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 48(18). 185201–185201. 2 indexed citations
6.
Wright, R. M., et al.. (1993). Computational Issues in Urban Design: Developing a Strategy for Solar Impact Assessment.. 1(1). 543–555. 2 indexed citations
7.
Wright, R. M.. (1993). THE BETWEENESS OF PLACE: TOWARDS A GEOGRAPHY OF MODERNITY. Landscape Journal. 12(1). 60–61. 17 indexed citations
8.
Alster, J., Benjamin F. Gibson, J. S. McCarthy, M. S. Weiss, & R. M. Wright. (1973). Elastic Electron Scattering fromSr88. Physical Review C. 7(3). 1089–1098. 4 indexed citations
9.
MacGregor, Malcolm H., Richard A. Arndt, & R. M. Wright. (1969). Phase-Shift Analysis of High-Precision (p, p) Differential Cross-Section Data at 6.141, 8.097, and 9.918 MeV. Physical Review. 179(5). 1624–1626. 9 indexed citations
10.
MacGregor, Malcolm H., Richard A. Arndt, & R. M. Wright. (1969). Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Matrix. X. (p,p) and (n,p) Analysis from 1 to 450 MeV. Physical Review. 182(5). 1714–1728. 388 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Arndt, Richard A., et al.. (1968). Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Matrix. IX. (n,p) Analysis from 7 to 750 MeV. Physical Review. 173(5). 1272–1301. 94 indexed citations
12.
MacGregor, Malcolm H., Richard A. Arndt, & R. M. Wright. (1968). Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Matrix. VIII. (p,p) Analysis from 350 to 750 MeV. Physical Review. 169(5). 1149–1166. 82 indexed citations
13.
MacGregor, Malcolm H., Richard A. Arndt, & R. M. Wright. (1968). Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Matrix. VII. (p,p) Analysis from 0 to 400 MeV. Physical Review. 169(5). 1128–1148. 102 indexed citations
14.
Gammel, J. L., Cecil Rousseau, D.P. Saylor, & R. M. Wright. (1967). Kinetic energy as a perturbation. II. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 20(2). 229–238. 1 indexed citations
15.
MacGregor, Malcolm H., R. M. Wright, & Richard A. Arndt. (1967). Phase-Shift Analysis of High-Precision (p, p) Polarization Data at 19.7 MeV. Physical Review Letters. 19(20). 1209–1212. 7 indexed citations
16.
Wright, R. M., Malcolm H. MacGregor, & Richard A. Arndt. (1967). Determination of the Nucleon-Nucleon Elastic Scattering Matrix. VI. New Results near 50 MeV. Physical Review. 159(5). 1422–1426. 6 indexed citations
17.
Noyes, H. Pierre, Peter Signell, N. R. Yoder, & R. M. Wright. (1967). Comparison of Moderate-Energy Proton-Proton Models. III. Physical Review. 159(4). 789–792. 6 indexed citations
18.
Arndt, R. A., Michael J. Moravcsik, & R. M. Wright. (1967). Predictions of the twelve-dimensional groups and nucleon-nucleon scattering. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 49(4). 606–613. 2 indexed citations
19.
Roper, L. David & R. M. Wright. (1965). Pion-Nucleon Phase-Shift Analysis: 0-350 MeV. Physical Review. 138(4B). B921–B932. 51 indexed citations
20.
Roper, L. David, R. M. Wright, & Bernard T. Feld. (1965). Energy-Dependent Pion-Nucleon Phase-Shift Analysis. Physical Review. 138(1B). B190–B210. 287 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026