R. L. Fork

11.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
110 papers, 8.4k citations indexed

About

R. L. Fork is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, R. L. Fork has authored 110 papers receiving a total of 8.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 81 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 65 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 11 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in R. L. Fork's work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (41 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (36 papers) and Solid State Laser Technologies (20 papers). R. L. Fork is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (41 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (36 papers) and Solid State Laser Technologies (20 papers). R. L. Fork collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. R. L. Fork's co-authors include C. V. Shank, J. P. Gordon, C. H. Brito Cruz, Oscar E. Martínez, P. C. Becker, B. I. Greene, R. Yen, W. J. Tomlinson, J. A. Valdmanis and M. A. Pollack and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

In The Last Decade

R. L. Fork

104 papers receiving 7.7k citations

Hit Papers

Negative dispersion using pairs of prisms 1981 2026 1996 2011 1984 1987 1981 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. L. Fork United States 41 6.6k 4.3k 706 688 636 110 8.4k
C. L. Tang United States 51 5.3k 0.8× 3.8k 0.9× 819 1.2× 730 1.1× 432 0.7× 198 7.0k
Wayne H. Knox United States 45 5.3k 0.8× 4.2k 1.0× 549 0.8× 467 0.7× 591 0.9× 229 6.7k
A. Antonetti France 45 5.0k 0.8× 1.4k 0.3× 825 1.2× 832 1.2× 384 0.6× 147 6.8k
R. W. Schoenlein United States 44 3.9k 0.6× 2.0k 0.5× 658 0.9× 1.9k 2.8× 637 1.0× 121 8.0k
H. Fröhlich United Kingdom 32 3.2k 0.5× 1.1k 0.3× 477 0.7× 1.3k 1.9× 503 0.8× 136 6.9k
А. М. Желтиков Russia 50 9.1k 1.4× 5.7k 1.3× 932 1.3× 791 1.1× 1.0k 1.6× 708 11.3k
S. De Silvestri Italy 57 10.5k 1.6× 5.5k 1.3× 1.9k 2.7× 1.5k 2.1× 1.2k 1.9× 301 14.0k
S. L. Shapiro United States 32 3.1k 0.5× 1.5k 0.4× 373 0.5× 204 0.3× 266 0.4× 79 3.8k
C. V. Shank United States 69 12.2k 1.8× 8.0k 1.9× 1.7k 2.4× 2.0k 2.9× 1.4k 2.2× 160 16.9k
M. D. Levenson United States 39 5.2k 0.8× 2.5k 0.6× 1.4k 2.0× 421 0.6× 918 1.4× 110 6.9k

Countries citing papers authored by R. L. Fork

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. L. Fork's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. L. Fork with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. L. Fork more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. L. Fork

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. L. Fork. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. L. Fork. The network helps show where R. L. Fork may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. L. Fork

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. L. Fork. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. L. Fork based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. L. Fork. R. L. Fork is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fork, R. L.. (2002). Solar Pumped Laser for Space Power. 747. 1 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Matthew, et al.. (2001). Safe delivery of optical power from space. Optics Express. 8(10). 537–537. 28 indexed citations
3.
Fork, R. L., et al.. (1999). <title>Resonant transmissive modulator construction for use in beam steering arrays</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3787. 115–125. 1 indexed citations
4.
Scalora, Michael, Sabine Reinhardt, R. L. Fork, et al.. (1996). Ultrashort pulse propagation at the photonic band edge: Large tunable group delay with minimal distortion and loss. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 54(2). R1078–R1081. 161 indexed citations
5.
Becker, P. C., et al.. (1989). Generation of tunable 9 femtosecond optical pulses in the near infrared. Applied Physics Letters. 54(5). 411–412. 31 indexed citations
6.
Cruz, C. H. Brito, R. L. Fork, & C. V. Shank. (1987). Compression of optical pulses to 6 fs using cubic phase distortion compensation. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 4 indexed citations
7.
Fork, R. L., et al.. (1987). Direct observation of femtosecond intercarrier thermalization in gallium arsenide. 1 indexed citations
8.
Cruz, C. H. Brito, R. L. Fork, & C. V. Shank. (1987). Direct observation of femtosecond inter-carrier thermalization in gallium arsenide. 4. 104. 1 indexed citations
9.
Fork, R. L., C. H. Brito Cruz, P. C. Becker, & C. V. Shank. (1987). Compression of optical pulses to six femtoseconds by using cubic phase compensation. Optics Letters. 12(7). 483–483. 610 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Cruz, C. H. Brito, R. L. Fork, Wayne H. Knox, & C. V. Shank. (1986). Spectral hole burning in large molecules probed with 10 fs optical pulses. Chemical Physics Letters. 132(4-5). 341–344. 218 indexed citations
11.
Valdmanis, J. A., R. L. Fork, & J. P. Gordon. (1985). DIRECT LASER GENERATION OF 27-FSEC ULTRASHORT OPTICAL PULSES. Optics News. 11(12). 11–11. 5 indexed citations
12.
Gordon, J. P., R. L. Fork, & Oscar E. Martínez. (1984). Negative Dispersion from Prisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 1. 437.
13.
Yen, R., C. V. Shank, & R. L. Fork. (1983). <title>Femtosecond Optical Pulses And Technology</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 439. 2–5. 1 indexed citations
14.
Shank, C. V., R. Yen, R. L. Fork, J. Orenstein, & G. L. Baker. (1982). Picosecond Dynamics of Photoexcited Gap States in Polyacetylene. Physical Review Letters. 49(22). 1660–1663. 201 indexed citations
15.
Fork, R. L.. (1981). Generation of pulses shorter than 0.1 psec by colliding pulse modelocking. Applied Physics Letters. 38. 671–673. 4 indexed citations
16.
Fork, R. L., B. I. Greene, & Charles V. Shank. (1981). Generation of optical pulses shorter than 0.1 psec by colliding pulse mode-locking. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. WL1–WL1. 83 indexed citations
17.
Shank, C. V., Erich P. Ippen, R. L. Fork, A. Migus, & T. Kobayashi. (1980). Application of subpicosecond optical techniques to molecular dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 298(1439). 303–308. 1 indexed citations
18.
Fork, R. L., et al.. (1978). Real-time intensity autocorrelation interferometer. Applied Optics. 17(22). 3534–3534. 38 indexed citations
19.
Fork, R. L. & M. Sargent. (1966). Multiple Quantum Processes in Magnetic Field-tuned Optical Masers. 611. 1 indexed citations
20.
Fork, R. L., L. E. Hargrove, & M. A. Pollack. (1964). POPULATION PULSATIONS AND LIFETIMES IN He–Ne LASERS. Applied Physics Letters. 5(1). 5–7. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026