R Gale

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
61 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

R Gale is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, R Gale has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 21 papers in General Health Professions and 12 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in R Gale's work include Birth, Development, and Health (11 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (9 papers) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (8 papers). R Gale is often cited by papers focused on Birth, Development, and Health (11 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (9 papers) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (8 papers). R Gale collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. R Gale's co-authors include Arie Laor, Seidman Ds, Daniel S. Seidman, P Ever-Hadani, David K. Stevenson, Amanda M. Midboe, Justina Wu, Taryn Erhardt, Mark Bounthavong and Caitlin M. Reardon and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

R Gale

59 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic meth... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R Gale Israel 22 954 503 478 468 268 61 2.0k
Christine Newburn‐Cook Canada 21 1.1k 1.2× 554 1.1× 470 1.0× 616 1.3× 146 0.5× 48 2.2k
B Haglund Sweden 22 812 0.9× 298 0.6× 465 1.0× 485 1.0× 215 0.8× 37 2.4k
Mandy Williams Australia 17 1.0k 1.1× 316 0.6× 287 0.6× 879 1.9× 174 0.6× 59 1.7k
William M. Sappenfield United States 24 1.1k 1.2× 430 0.9× 477 1.0× 854 1.8× 181 0.7× 87 2.0k
Janet Tucker United Kingdom 21 806 0.8× 492 1.0× 281 0.6× 375 0.8× 566 2.1× 41 2.0k
Bengt Haglund Sweden 32 1.5k 1.5× 505 1.0× 572 1.2× 899 1.9× 508 1.9× 73 3.0k
Alan R. Fleischman United States 24 738 0.8× 474 0.9× 642 1.3× 131 0.3× 251 0.9× 91 2.1k
Imtiaz Jehan Pakistan 23 796 0.8× 427 0.8× 504 1.1× 191 0.4× 227 0.8× 53 2.1k
Ziona Haklai Israel 20 762 0.8× 219 0.4× 730 1.5× 504 1.1× 137 0.5× 76 2.2k
Beverley O’Brien Canada 27 484 0.5× 471 0.9× 745 1.6× 430 0.9× 263 1.0× 53 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by R Gale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R Gale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R Gale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R Gale. The network helps show where R Gale may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R Gale

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R Gale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R Gale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R Gale. R Gale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yank, Veronica, R Gale, Andrea Nevedal, et al.. (2021). Improving Uptake of a National Web-Based Psychoeducational Workshop for Informal Caregivers of Veterans: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(1). e16495–e16495. 2 indexed citations
2.
Midboe, Amanda M., et al.. (2020). Implementation of health-focused interventions in vulnerable populations: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open. 10(7). e036937–e036937. 5 indexed citations
3.
Gale, R, I‐Chun Thomas, Karl Lorenz, et al.. (2019). Medical Record Documentation of Goals-of-Care Discussions Among Older Veterans With Incident Kidney Failure. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 75(5). 744–752. 6 indexed citations
4.
Gale, R, Justina Wu, Taryn Erhardt, et al.. (2019). Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration. Implementation Science. 14(1). 11–11. 510 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Gale, R, Joy R. Goebel, Ariadna Garcia, & Karl Lorenz. (2018). Quality Improvement and The Veterans Health Administration’s Palliative Care National Clinical Template (QI812). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 55(2). 706–706. 1 indexed citations
6.
Gale, R, et al.. (2016). Effect of a Dialysis Access Coordinator on Preemptive Access Placement among Veterans: A Quality Improvement Initiative. American Journal of Nephrology. 45(1). 14–21. 7 indexed citations
7.
Helfrich, Christian D., R Gale, David C. Mohr, et al.. (2015). The facilitators and barriers associated with implementation of a patient-centered medical home in VHA. Implementation Science. 11(1). 24–24. 24 indexed citations
8.
Gale, R, Steven M. Asch, Thomas J. Taylor, et al.. (2015). The most used and most helpful facilitators for patient-centered medical home implementation. Implementation Science. 10(1). 52–52. 15 indexed citations
9.
Bowman, Candice, et al.. (2015). A Qualitative Evaluation of Web-Based Cancer Care Quality Improvement Toolkit Use in the Veterans Health Administration. Quality Management in Health Care. 24(3). 147–161. 4 indexed citations
10.
Luck, Jeff, Candice Bowman, Amanda M. Midboe, et al.. (2014). Multimethod Evaluation of the VA’s Peer-to-Peer Toolkit for Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 29(S2). 572–578. 18 indexed citations
11.
Chapman, A.H., et al.. (2008). Precautions to be taken by radiologists and radiographers when prescribing hyoscine-N-butylbromide. Clinical Radiology. 63(7). 739–743. 37 indexed citations
12.
Moise, J., et al.. (1998). The outcome of twin pregnancies after IVF. Human Reproduction. 13(6). 1702–1705. 102 indexed citations
13.
Laor, Arie, et al.. (1997). Size at birth, maternal nutritional status in pregnancy, and blood pressure at age 17: population based analysis. BMJ. 315(7106). 449–453. 90 indexed citations
14.
Kerem, Eitan, Shaul Dollberg, Y. Armon, et al.. (1997). Prenatal ritodrine administration and the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants.. PubMed. 17(2). 101–6. 4 indexed citations
15.
Gale, R, et al.. (1995). Six year neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birthweight children.. PubMed. 31(5). 303–8. 11 indexed citations
16.
Gale, R, et al.. (1994). MD Candidates Want Better Training in Research. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London. 28(6). 564–566. 4 indexed citations
17.
Ds, Seidman, et al.. (1992). Apgar Scores and Cognitive Performance at 17 Years of Age. Survey of Anesthesiology. 36(2). 68–68. 24 indexed citations
18.
Seidman, Daniel S., Shaul Dollberg, David K. Stevenson, & R Gale. (1991). The effects of high parity and socioeconomic status on obstetric and neonatal outcome. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 249(3). 119–127. 25 indexed citations
19.
Grant, Janet & R Gale. (1989). Changing medical education†. Medical Education. 23(3). 252–257. 29 indexed citations
20.
Gale, R, et al.. (1988). Ethical problems in cardiac surgery for a lethal, congenital malformation.. PubMed. 8(2). 137–40.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026