R. Frazier

9.1k total citations
11 papers, 96 citations indexed

About

R. Frazier is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computer Networks and Communications and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Frazier has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 96 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in R. Frazier's work include Particle Detector Development and Performance (8 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers) and Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (2 papers). R. Frazier is often cited by papers focused on Particle Detector Development and Performance (8 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers) and Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques (2 papers). R. Frazier collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States. R. Frazier's co-authors include Mary Ann Ingram, Robert J. Baxley, G. Iles, J. J. Brooke, Pamela Klabbers, A. Rose, Simon Fayer, S. Galagedera, H. F. Heath and C. Foudas and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Journal of Instrumentation and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

R. Frazier

10 papers receiving 93 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Frazier Switzerland 4 58 44 38 13 8 11 96
R. Rechenmacher United States 6 22 0.4× 22 0.5× 27 0.7× 4 0.3× 4 0.5× 20 60
A. Barczyk United States 8 52 0.9× 135 3.1× 33 0.9× 7 0.5× 4 0.5× 24 177
A. Annovi Italy 6 24 0.4× 32 0.7× 36 0.9× 15 1.2× 17 2.1× 25 89
J. Olsen United States 5 37 0.6× 21 0.5× 21 0.6× 7 0.5× 9 1.1× 21 69
M.S. Emery United States 5 55 0.9× 18 0.4× 20 0.5× 5 0.4× 9 1.1× 16 81
F. Ratnikov Russia 6 12 0.2× 12 0.3× 61 1.6× 18 1.4× 12 1.5× 28 90
J. W. Schumacher Switzerland 5 21 0.4× 24 0.5× 41 1.1× 3 0.2× 16 2.0× 12 83
F. Crescioli Italy 5 23 0.4× 48 1.1× 41 1.1× 18 1.4× 11 1.4× 22 82
S. Jindariani United States 5 35 0.6× 19 0.4× 23 0.6× 23 1.8× 6 0.8× 12 88
S. Huber Germany 5 24 0.4× 20 0.5× 34 0.9× 6 0.5× 8 1.0× 20 59

Countries citing papers authored by R. Frazier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Frazier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Frazier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Frazier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Frazier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Frazier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Frazier. The network helps show where R. Frazier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Frazier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Frazier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Frazier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Frazier. R. Frazier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Frazier, R., et al.. (2021). Design of a Joint Alamouti-MIMO and Wavelet Packet Modulation System. 1–8. 1 indexed citations
2.
Baxley, Robert J., et al.. (2014). Achieving positive rate with undetectable communication Over MIMO rayleigh channels. 257–260. 21 indexed citations
3.
Compton, Katherine, S. Dasu, Amin Farmahini-Farahani, et al.. (2012). The MP7 and CTP-6: multi-hundred Gbps processing boards for calorimeter trigger upgrades at CMS. Journal of Instrumentation. 7(12). C12024–C12024. 22 indexed citations
4.
Brooke, J. J., C. Foudas, R. Frazier, et al.. (2010). Performance of the CMS Global Calorimeter Trigger. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 623(1). 546–548. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Tapper, A., J. J. Brooke, C. Foudas, et al.. (2008). Commissioning and performance of the CMS Global Calorimeter Trigger. 1871–1873. 3 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Julian R., J. Nash, C. Foudas, et al.. (2007). Revised CMS Global Calorimeter Trigger Functionality & Algorithms. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 3 indexed citations
8.
Heath, H. F., A. Tapper, Julian R. Jones, et al.. (2007). First results on the performance of the CMS global calorimeter trigger. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
9.
Brooke, J. J., et al.. (2004). Design and Implementation of the Global Calorimeter Trigger for CMS. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1–5. 1 indexed citations
10.
Brooke, J. J., et al.. (2003). Hardware and Firmware for the CMS Global Calorimeter Trigger. CERN Bulletin. 226–229.
11.
Brooke, J. J., D. Cussans, R. Frazier, et al.. (2003). 10 th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiments. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026