This map shows the geographic impact of R E Schlenker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R E Schlenker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R E Schlenker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R E Schlenker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R E Schlenker. The network helps show where R E Schlenker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R E Schlenker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R E Schlenker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R E Schlenker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R E Schlenker. R E Schlenker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schlenker, R E, et al.. (1997). Rehabilitation costs: implications for prospective payment.. PubMed. 32(5). 651–68.20 indexed citations
3.
Kramer, Andrew M., John F. Steiner, R E Schlenker, et al.. (1997). Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. A comparison of rehabilitation settings.. PubMed. 277(5). 396–404.268 indexed citations
Shaughnessy, Peter W., R E Schlenker, & David F. Hittle. (1995). Case mix of home health patients under capitated and fee-for-service payment.. PubMed. 30(1). 79–113.10 indexed citations
6.
Grigsby, Jim, et al.. (1995). Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine.. PubMed. 17(1). 115–31.60 indexed citations
Shaughnessy, Peter W., et al.. (1995). Outcome-based quality improvement in home care.. PubMed. 14(2). 44–9.11 indexed citations
9.
Shaughnessy, Peter W., R E Schlenker, & David F. Hittle. (1994). Home health care outcomes under capitated and fee-for-service payment.. PubMed. 16(1). 187–222.76 indexed citations
10.
Shaughnessy, Peter W., Kathryn S. Crisler, R E Schlenker, et al.. (1994). Measuring and assuring the quality of home health care.. PubMed. 16(1). 35–67.46 indexed citations
11.
Schlenker, R E. (1991). Nursing home costs, Medicaid rates, and profits under alternative Medicaid payment systems.. PubMed. 26(5). 623–49.11 indexed citations
12.
Shaughnessy, Peter W., R E Schlenker, & Andrew M. Kramer. (1990). Quality of long-term care in nursing homes and swing-bed hospitals.. PubMed. 25(1 Pt 1). 65–96.17 indexed citations
13.
Schlenker, R E & Peter W. Shaughnessy. (1989). Swing-bed hospital cost and reimbursement.. PubMed. 26(4). 508–21.3 indexed citations
14.
Shaughnessy, Peter W., et al.. (1988). Evaluation of the national swing-bed program in rural hospitals.. PubMed. 10(1). 87–94.7 indexed citations
15.
Shaughnessy, Peter W. & R E Schlenker. (1986). Hospital swing-bed care in the United States.. PubMed. 21(4). 477–98.14 indexed citations
16.
Schlenker, R E, et al.. (1985). Estimating patient-level nursing home costs.. PubMed. 20(1). 103–28.3 indexed citations
17.
Schlenker, R E, et al.. (1984). Case mix, quality, and cost relationships in Colorado nursing homes.. PubMed. 6(2). 61–71.37 indexed citations
18.
Schlenker, R E, et al.. (1983). The effect of case mix and quality on cost differences between hospital-based and freestanding nursing homes.. PubMed. 20(4). 361–8.6 indexed citations
19.
Shaughnessy, Peter W., et al.. (1983). Case mix and surrogate indicators of quality of care over time in freestanding and hospital-based nursing homes in Colorado.. PubMed. 98(5). 486–92.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.