R. D. Piper

15 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

R. D. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 94
  • Epidemiology 214
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 39
  • Immunology 116
Replace Nicolas T. Schwarz with:
Nicolas T. Schwarz United States
Michiel Vaneker Netherlands
Elisabetta Galloni Italy
Dorothea Closhen Germany
Takahiro Matsumoto Japan
D Olthoff Germany
Shu‐Mien Chuang Taiwan
Gideon Eshel Israel
Juha Koskenkari Finland
Robert S. B. Clark United States
R. D. Piper relative to Nicolas T. Schwarz United States Nicolas T. Schwarz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Nicolas T. Schwarz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. D. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. D. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. D. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. D. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. D. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. D. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. D. Piper. The network helps show where R. D. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. D. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. D. Piper Line = papers co-authored together R. D. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1996109
2 199192
3 200478
4 199669
5 199836
6 198532
7 199330
8 199724
9 199922
10 199914
11 199812
12 198510
13 19918
14 20022
15 19911
16 20220

About R. D. Piper

R. D. Piper is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Immunology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (2 papers) and Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (81 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (94 citations), Epidemiology (214 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (39 citations) and Immunology (116 citations). R. D. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William J. Sibbald, G.A. Lambert, J. W. Duckworth, Roger C. Bone, Richard F. Potter, Peter J. Goadsby, Mary Lee Myers, James W. Lance, Lars Edvinsson and Rolf Ekman. Their work appears in journals such as Cephalalgia, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Stroke and Journal of Applied Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact