R. Craig Yoder

710 total citations
26 papers, 547 citations indexed

About

R. Craig Yoder is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Craig Yoder has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 547 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 7 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in R. Craig Yoder's work include Radiation Dose and Imaging (15 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (7 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (4 papers). R. Craig Yoder is often cited by papers focused on Radiation Dose and Imaging (15 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (7 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (4 papers). R. Craig Yoder collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and India. R. Craig Yoder's co-authors include Michele M. Doody, John D. Boice, Michael T. Mumma, Jack S. Mandel, Sarah S. Cohen, M.S. Akselrod, Lawrence T. Dauer, Gleb M. Akselrod, Steven L. Simon and Martha S. Linet and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, Radiology and Radiation Research.

In The Last Decade

R. Craig Yoder

23 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Craig Yoder United States 13 388 142 139 88 54 26 547
Balázs G. Madas Hungary 14 218 0.6× 102 0.7× 212 1.5× 73 0.8× 22 0.4× 33 376
D.A. Cool United States 10 270 0.7× 131 0.9× 143 1.0× 64 0.7× 40 0.7× 23 509
J. F. Bottollier-Depois France 15 229 0.6× 51 0.4× 321 2.3× 212 2.4× 20 0.4× 37 548
S. L. Simon United States 10 364 0.9× 115 0.8× 74 0.5× 56 0.6× 65 1.2× 12 543
P. J. Mountford United Kingdom 14 329 0.8× 45 0.3× 196 1.4× 252 2.9× 89 1.6× 53 559
Didier Franck France 17 573 1.5× 147 1.0× 252 1.8× 424 4.8× 118 2.2× 104 847
Richard Harbron United Kingdom 13 397 1.0× 56 0.4× 124 0.9× 45 0.5× 108 2.0× 29 518
T Giaddui United States 10 252 0.6× 70 0.5× 223 1.6× 300 3.4× 87 1.6× 32 491
A. Kaul Germany 11 254 0.7× 56 0.4× 134 1.0× 43 0.5× 50 0.9× 49 439
S.Yu. Chekin Russia 10 349 0.9× 75 0.5× 56 0.4× 13 0.1× 19 0.4× 42 459

Countries citing papers authored by R. Craig Yoder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Craig Yoder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Craig Yoder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Craig Yoder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Craig Yoder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Craig Yoder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Craig Yoder. The network helps show where R. Craig Yoder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Craig Yoder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Craig Yoder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Craig Yoder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Craig Yoder. R. Craig Yoder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boice, John D., Sarah S. Cohen, Michael T. Mumma, et al.. (2021). Mortality from leukemia, cancer and heart disease among U.S. nuclear power plant workers, 1957–2011. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 98(4). 657–678. 31 indexed citations
2.
Boice, John D., et al.. (2021). Mortality among medical radiation workers in the United States, 1965–2016. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 99(2). 183–207. 33 indexed citations
3.
Boice, John D., Brian Quinn, Isaf Al‐Nabulsi, et al.. (2021). A million persons, a million dreams: a vision for a national center of radiation epidemiology and biology. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 98(4). 795–821. 33 indexed citations
4.
Villoing, Daphnée, et al.. (2018). A U.S. Multicenter Study of Recorded Occupational Radiation Badge Doses in Nuclear Medicine. Radiology. 287(2). 676–682. 17 indexed citations
5.
Villoing, Daphnée, et al.. (2018). Photon energy readings in OSL dosimeter filters: an application to retrospective dose estimation for nuclear medicine workers. Journal of Radiological Protection. 38(3). 1053–1063. 1 indexed citations
6.
Yoder, R. Craig, Lawrence T. Dauer, Stephen Balter, et al.. (2018). Dosimetry for the study of medical radiation workers with a focus on the mean absorbed dose to the lung, brain and other organs. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 98(4). 619–630. 17 indexed citations
7.
Dauer, Lawrence T., André Bouville, Richard E. Toohey, et al.. (2018). Dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Report No. 178. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 98(4). 600–609. 26 indexed citations
8.
Kroenke, David M., et al.. (2017). Database Concepts (8th Edition).
9.
Villoing, Daphnée, et al.. (2017). 0216 Occupational radiation doses in nuclear medicine: a us multi-centre study. HighWire Press Open Archive. A65.1–A65.
10.
Yoder, R. Craig, et al.. (2016). A REVIEW OF TWO METHODS USED IN THE USA TO ASSESSHEDURING FLUOROSCOPIC-BASED RADIOLOGY. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 170(1-4). 307–310. 8 indexed citations
11.
Simon, Steven L., Dale L. Preston, Martha S. Linet, et al.. (2014). Radiation Organ Doses Received in a Nationwide Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists: Methods and Findings. Radiation Research. 182(5). 507–528. 55 indexed citations
12.
Yoder, R. Craig, et al.. (2010). Co-"Lab"oration: A New Paradigm for Building a Management Information Systems Course.. Information Systems Education Journal. 8(2). 2 indexed citations
13.
Simon, Steven L., Robert M. Weinstock, Michele M. Doody, et al.. (2006). Estimating Historical Radiation Doses to a Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists. Radiation Research. 166(1). 174–192. 67 indexed citations
14.
Boice, John D., Richard W. Leggett, Elizabeth D. Ellis, et al.. (2006). A COMPREHENSIVE DOSE RECONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY FOR FORMER ROCKETDYNE/ATOMICS INTERNATIONAL RADIATION WORKERS. Health Physics. 90(5). 409–430. 46 indexed citations
15.
Akselrod, M.S., R. Craig Yoder, & Gleb M. Akselrod. (2006). Confocal fluorescent imaging of tracks from heavy charged particles utilising new Al2O3:C,Mg crystals. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 119(1-4). 357–362. 35 indexed citations
17.
Gupta, Viney, et al.. (1995). Criteria for Performing Multiple Dosimetry. Health Physics. 69(4). 570–576. 1 indexed citations
18.
Rosenstein, Marvin, Libby Brateman, H. Gregg Claycamp, J.W. Poston, & R. Craig Yoder. (1995). Use of personal monitors to estimate effective dose equivalent and effective dose to workers for external exposure to low-LET radiation. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 35 indexed citations
19.
Mandel, Jack S., et al.. (1992). A health survey of radiologic technologists. Cancer. 69(2). 586–598. 89 indexed citations
20.
Buddemeier, Brooke, et al.. (1992). A Comparison of the Neutron Response of CR-39 Made by Different Manufacturers. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 44(1-4). 317–321. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026