R. C. Thomas

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 762 citations indexed

About

R. C. Thomas is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. C. Thomas has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 762 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 paper in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in R. C. Thomas's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (5 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper). R. C. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (5 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper). R. C. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. R. C. Thomas's co-authors include P. Nugent, I. V. Panov, N. T. Zinner, Brian D. Metzger, G. Martı́nez-Pinedo, Daniel Kasen, Siva Darbha, Eliot Quataert, Almudena Arcones and M. Sullivan and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

R. C. Thomas

7 papers receiving 721 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Electromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei

2010 645 citations Brian D. Metzger, G. Martı́nez-Pinedo et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society profile →

Peers

R. C. Thomas

AA

NHEP

SA

ASZ

ACS

Scott Perkins United States

J. A. Collins United States

Yjan Gordon United States

M. Keane United States

Youichi Yamada Japan

James W. McKee United Kingdom

Janet H. Wood United Kingdom

Maureen L. Savage United States

S. N. Borovikov United States

A. J. Herz Switzerland

Scott Perkins United States

R. C. Thomas

421 ×0.6

AA

211 ×0.9

NHEP

29 ×0.5

SA

4 ×0.1

ASZ

18 ×0.6

ACS

Citations per year, relative to R. C. Thomas R. C. Thomas (= 1×) peers Scott Perkins

Countries citing papers authored by R. C. Thomas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. C. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. C. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. C. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. C. Thomas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. C. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. C. Thomas. The network helps show where R. C. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. C. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. C. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. C. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. C. Thomas. R. C. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Friesen, Brian, E. Baron, J. Parrent, et al.. (2017). Optical and ultraviolet spectroscopic analysis of SN 2011fe at late times. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. stx241–stx241. 6 indexed citations

2.

Baron, E., P. Hoêflich, Brian Friesen, et al.. (2015). Spectral models for early time SN 2011fe observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 454(3). 2549–2556. 5 indexed citations

3.

Thomas, R. C.. (2013). SYN++: Standalone SN spectrum synthesis. ascl. 1 indexed citations

4.

Sullivan, M., M. M. Kasliwal, P. Nugent, et al.. (2011). THE SUBLUMINOUS AND PECULIAR TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA PTF 09dav. The Astrophysical Journal. 732(2). 118–118. 29 indexed citations

5.

Metzger, Brian D., G. Martı́nez-Pinedo, Siva Darbha, et al.. (2010). Electromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 406(4). 2650–2662. 645 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Thomas, R. C., et al.. (2002). SUSPECT, The Online Supernova Spectrum Archive: Year Two. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 201. 1 indexed citations

7.

Thomas, R. C., et al.. (1989). Behaviour of cows in cubicles and its possible relationship with laminitis in replacement dairy heifers.. PubMed. 125(23). 573–5. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact