Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Electrostatic solitary structures in non‐thermal plasmas
1995802 citationsR. A. Cairns, R. Bingham et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Bingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Bingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Bingham more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Bingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Bingham. The network helps show where R. Bingham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Bingham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Bingham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Bingham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Bingham. R. Bingham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bingham, R., et al.. (2013). Laminar shocks in high power laser plasma interactions. Science and Technology Facilities Council.7 indexed citations
11.
Bingham, R., et al.. (2010). Gravitational Lamb Shift of Bose-Einstein Condensates due to Spacetime Fluctuations. arXiv (Cornell University).
12.
Wang, Charles, et al.. (2008). Detection of quantum decoherence due to spacetime fluctuations. 37. 3390.4 indexed citations
13.
Lundin, J., M. Marklund, Erik Lundström, et al.. (2006). Detection of elastic photon-photon scattering through four-wave mixing using high power lasers. arXiv (Cornell University).4 indexed citations
14.
Shukla, P. K. & R. Bingham. (2005). Kinetic Aspects of Solar Coronal Heating. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 47.1 indexed citations
15.
Bingham, R., et al.. (1996). Mechanisms for the interaction of dust particles in plasmas. Plasma Physics Reports. 22(11). 932–942.12 indexed citations
16.
Tsytovich, V. N., et al.. (1995). Collective Plasma Processes in the Solar Interior and the Problem of the Solar Neutrino Deficit. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 96. 29918.2 indexed citations
17.
Tsytovich, V. N., R. Bingham, & U. de Angelis. (1992). Arrest of wave collapse and transitional damping. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 14(6). 361–368.3 indexed citations
18.
Bingham, R., D. A. Bryant, & D. S. Hall. (1985). Auroral electron acceleration by lower-hybrid waves. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 6(2). 159–167.16 indexed citations
19.
Bingham, R.. (1979). Grating spectrometers and spectrographs re-examined. Quarterly journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 20. 395–421.8 indexed citations
20.
Bingham, R., et al.. (1977). New polarisation maps of nebulae.. The New Scientist. 73. 712–714.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.