Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Tension studies of human knee ligaments. Yield point, ultimate failure, and disruption of the cruciate and tibial collateral ligaments
1976332 citationsR. Baxter Willis et al.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgeryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by R. Baxter Willis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Baxter Willis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Baxter Willis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Baxter Willis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Baxter Willis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Baxter Willis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Baxter Willis. The network helps show where R. Baxter Willis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Baxter Willis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Baxter Willis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Baxter Willis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Baxter Willis. R. Baxter Willis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Herman, Martin J., James J. McCarthy, R. Baxter Willis, & Peter D. Pizzutillo. (2011). Top 10 pediatric orthopaedic surgical emergencies: a case-based approach for the surgeon on call.. PubMed. 60. 373–95.22 indexed citations
3.
Krishnan, Sumant G., et al.. (2005). Scapulothoracic Arthrodesis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. &NA;(435). 126–133.30 indexed citations
4.
Willis, R. Baxter, et al.. (2003). Tibial eminence fractures. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 34(3). 365–375.43 indexed citations
Willis, R. Baxter. (2001). Developmental dysplasia of the hip: assessment and treatment before walking age.. PubMed. 50. 541–5.1 indexed citations
7.
Costelloe, Colleen M., et al.. (2001). Radiology case of the month. Congenital bone disorder associated with deformity, fracture, and pseudoarthrosis. Congenital tibial dysplasia--neurofibromatosis type I (NF1).. PubMed. 153(3). 119–21.1 indexed citations
Galpin, Robert D., et al.. (1992). Control of interfragmentary micromotion in Ilizarov distractional osteogenesis.. PubMed. 52(1). 36–8.3 indexed citations
Kennedy, John C., Richard J. Hawkins, & R. Baxter Willis. (1977). Strain Gauge Analysis of Knee Ligaments. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 129(129). 225–225.96 indexed citations
Willis, R. Baxter, et al.. (1976). Tension studies of human knee ligaments. Yield point, ultimate failure, and disruption of the cruciate and tibial collateral ligaments. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 58(3). 350–355.332 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Fowler, Peter J. & R. Baxter Willis. (1975). Vascular compartment syndromes. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 56(5). 597–597.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.