Qing‐Lan Pei
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
- Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Papers in
-
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques 3
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 3
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 2
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 2
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 2
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 2
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 2
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 3
- Co-authors
- Wei‐Cheng Yuan (5 shared papers)Xiaomei Zhang (5 shared papers)Zhijun Wu (5 shared papers)Linfeng Cun (2 shared papers)Wenbing Chen (2 shared papers)Xilin Du (1 shared paper)Hongwei Sun (1 shared paper)Jin‐Quan Yu (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Organic Letters (2 papers)Tetrahedron (2 papers)ACS Catalysis (1 paper)Arabian Journal of Chemistry (1 paper)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Qing‐Lan Pei
11 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Organic Chemistry 405
- Inorganic Chemistry 52
- Pharmaceutical Science 14
- Pharmacology 32
- Toxicology 4
Countries citing papers authored by Qing‐Lan Pei
This map shows the geographic impact of Qing‐Lan Pei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qing‐Lan Pei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qing‐Lan Pei more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Qing‐Lan Pei
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Qing‐Lan Pei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Qing‐Lan Pei. The network helps show where Qing‐Lan Pei may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Qing‐Lan Pei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 266 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 1 |
About Qing‐Lan Pei
Qing‐Lan Pei is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (2 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (2 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (2 papers) and Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (405 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (52 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (14 citations), Pharmacology (32 citations) and Toxicology (4 citations). Qing‐Lan Pei has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wei‐Cheng Yuan, Xiaomei Zhang, Zhijun Wu, Linfeng Cun, Wenbing Chen, Xilin Du, Hongwei Sun, Jin‐Quan Yu, Panpan Wang and Jianghong Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Letters, Tetrahedron, ACS Catalysis, Arabian Journal of Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.