Q. Kong

1.5k citations
96 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Q. Kong

86 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Q. Kong
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 826
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 667
  • Mechanics of Materials 486
  • Spectroscopy 168
  • Radiation 64
Replace Kotaro Kondo with:
Kotaro Kondo Japan
J. E. Bailey United States
S.E. Rosenthal United States
M. Zen Italy
W. Shaikh United Kingdom
Michael Rappaport Israel
H Tanuma Japan
M. J. Shaw United Kingdom
F. P. Sch�fer Germany
Jianglai Liu China
Q. Kong relative to Kotaro Kondo Japan Kotaro Kondo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Kotaro Kondo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Q. Kong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Q. Kong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Q. Kong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Q. Kong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Q. Kong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Q. Kong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Q. Kong. The network helps show where Q. Kong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Q. Kong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Q. Kong Line = papers co-authored together Q. Kong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020111
2 2001106
3 199882
4 200272
5 202143
6 200042
7 199936
8 201934
9 200333
10 200432
11 200532
12 200231
13 202128
14 200522
15 200822
16 200721
17 201320
18 201017
19 201316
20 201416

About Q. Kong

Q. Kong is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (76 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (49 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (45 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (13 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (12 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (11 papers), Laser Design and Applications (7 papers) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (826 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (667 citations), Mechanics of Materials (486 citations), Spectroscopy (168 citations) and Radiation (64 citations). Q. Kong has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Y. K. Ho, S. Kawata, Xiaoqiang Chen, Xiaoqing Yuan, Lu Feng, E. Esarey, Fang Wang, Shuji Miyazaki, Kaijie Wang and Y. J. Gu. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Applied Physics, Laser and Particle Beams, Applied Physics B and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact