Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life
1991437 citationsP.J. van der Maas, Johannes J. M. van Delden et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by P.J. van der Maas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of P.J. van der Maas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.J. van der Maas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.J. van der Maas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P.J. van der Maas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.J. van der Maas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.J. van der Maas. The network helps show where P.J. van der Maas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P.J. van der Maas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P.J. van der Maas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P.J. van der Maas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P.J. van der Maas. P.J. van der Maas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burdorf, Alex, Saskia M. F. Pluijm, Cornelis H. Langeveld, et al.. (2009). Het zichtbaar maken van de maatschappelijke impact van gezondheidsonderzoek. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 153.
Wal, Gerrit van der, Agnes van der Heide, Bregje D. Onwuteaka‐Philipsen, & P.J. van der Maas. (2003). Medische besluitvorming aan het einde van het leven.14 indexed citations
6.
Koning, Harry J. de, Jacques Fracheboud, André L. M. Verbeek, Emiel J. Rutgers, & P.J. van der Maas. (2002). [The scientific basis for population screening for breast cancer in the Netherlands].. PubMed. 146(22). 1034–41.3 indexed citations
7.
Wal, Gerrit van der, P.J. van der Maas, Bregje D. Onwuteaka‐Philipsen, & Agnes van der Heide. (2001). [New research on the practice, reporting and reviewing of euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions, 2001/2002].. PubMed. 145(37). 1802–6.
Heide, Agnes van der, et al.. (1997). Medische beslissingen rond het levenseinde bij pasgeborenen en zuigelingen. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 141(40). 1913–1917.
Maas, P.J. van der, et al.. (1992). Een enquête naar gezondheid en huisartsbezoek onder Turkse en Nederlandse inwoners van Rotterdam. 136(22). 1065–1068.2 indexed citations
Habbema, J. Dik F., P.J. van der Maas, & Diederik W.J. Dippel. (1986). A perspective on the role of decision analysis in clinical practice.. PubMed. 137(3). 267–73.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.