Ping-Ping Wu

946 citations
18 papers · 802 · h-index 15

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 5%
    • Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
    • Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds

Papers in

Ping-Ping Wu

18 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Ping-Ping Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Toxicology 48
  • Pharmacology 82
  • Cancer Research 109
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 13
  • Molecular Biology 390
Replace Laura Lombardo with:
Laura Lombardo Italy
Haneen Amawi Jordan
Veronika Hanušová Czechia
Imre Ocsovszki Hungary
V.P. Kamboj India
Heather Wahl United States
Krishna B. Singh United States
Juanjuan Zhang China
Mohsin Ali Khan India
Dennis R.A. Mans Suriname
Ping-Ping Wu relative to Laura Lombardo Italy Laura Lombardo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Laura Lombardo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping-Ping Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping-Ping Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping-Ping Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping-Ping Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping-Ping Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping-Ping Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping-Ping Wu. The network helps show where Ping-Ping Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping-Ping Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping-Ping Wu Line = papers co-authored together Ping-Ping Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2010172
2 2013118
3 201259
4 201357
5 201651
6 201347
7 201442
8 201142
9 201239
10 201432
11 201629
12 201329
13 201522
14 200921
15 201218
16 201313
17 20107
18 20244

About Ping-Ping Wu

Ping-Ping Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science, Cancer Research and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (2 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (2 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers), Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (48 citations), Pharmacology (82 citations), Cancer Research (109 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (13 citations) and Molecular Biology (390 citations). Ping-Ping Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Jing‐Gung Chung, Jai‐Sing Yang, Hsiu‐Maan Kuo, Shu‐Jen Chang, Te‐Chun Hsia, Chia-Yu Ma, Shu‐Chun Hsu, Hui-Ying Huang, Mei-Due Yang and Jo‐Hua Chiang. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Toxicology, International Journal of Oncology, The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, Molecules and Human & Experimental Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact