Pierre Périnet

647 total citations
21 papers, 462 citations indexed

About

Pierre Périnet is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Pierre Périnet has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 462 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 11 papers in Plant Science and 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Pierre Périnet's work include Bioenergy crop production and management (12 papers), Forest ecology and management (5 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (4 papers). Pierre Périnet is often cited by papers focused on Bioenergy crop production and management (12 papers), Forest ecology and management (5 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (4 papers). Pierre Périnet collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Pierre Périnet's co-authors include M. Lalonde, Patrick G. Meirmans, Manuel Lamothe, Nathalie Isabel, Selvadurai Dayanandan, Jean Bousquet, Stacey Lee Thompson, Qibin Yu, Alfas Pliūra and John Mackay and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Molecular Ecology and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

Pierre Périnet

21 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pierre Périnet Canada 13 218 156 116 112 108 21 462
Henrik R. Hallingbäck Sweden 13 131 0.6× 103 0.7× 81 0.7× 160 1.4× 157 1.5× 32 452
Jeremy Brawner Australia 17 297 1.4× 72 0.5× 150 1.3× 113 1.0× 279 2.6× 54 727
Alfas Pliūra Lithuania 12 217 1.0× 131 0.8× 56 0.5× 50 0.4× 269 2.5× 34 611
Karl‐Anders Högberg Sweden 11 138 0.6× 58 0.4× 118 1.0× 28 0.3× 154 1.4× 25 310
Brian S. Baltunis Australia 15 190 0.9× 64 0.4× 55 0.5× 117 1.0× 408 3.8× 22 594
Dean W. Einspahr Slovakia 12 234 1.1× 171 1.1× 160 1.4× 48 0.4× 147 1.4× 56 505
Michael Henson Australia 15 176 0.8× 31 0.2× 110 0.9× 76 0.7× 238 2.2× 33 528
Brian J. Stanton United States 15 291 1.3× 332 2.1× 251 2.2× 161 1.4× 140 1.3× 33 766
Matti Haapanen Finland 15 247 1.1× 156 1.0× 78 0.7× 52 0.5× 440 4.1× 44 731
Aurélio Mendes Aguiar Brazil 12 331 1.5× 79 0.5× 77 0.7× 271 2.4× 182 1.7× 34 556

Countries citing papers authored by Pierre Périnet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre Périnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre Périnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre Périnet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre Périnet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre Périnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre Périnet. The network helps show where Pierre Périnet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pierre Périnet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pierre Périnet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pierre Périnet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pierre Périnet. Pierre Périnet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomas, Barb R., Michael Stoehr, Stefan G. Schreiber, et al.. (2024). Tree Improvement in Canada – past, present and future, 2023 and beyond. The Forestry Chronicle. 100(1). 59–87. 4 indexed citations
2.
3.
Larocque, Guy R., Annie DesRochers, Francine Tremblay, et al.. (2013). Research on hybrid poplars and willow species for fast-growing tree plantations: Its importance for growth and yield, silviculture, policy-making and commercial applications. The Forestry Chronicle. 89(1). 32–41. 14 indexed citations
4.
Koubaa, Ahmed, et al.. (2012). Anatomical properties of selected hybrid poplar clones grown in southern Quebec. BioResources. 7(3). 3779–3799. 11 indexed citations
5.
Feau, Nicolas, et al.. (2010). Recent advances related to poplar leaf spot and canker caused by Septoria musiva. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology. 32(2). 122–134. 40 indexed citations
6.
Meirmans, Patrick G., Manuel Lamothe, Damase P. Khasa, et al.. (2010). Complex patterns of hybridization between exotic and native North American poplar species. American Journal of Botany. 97(10). 1688–1697. 40 indexed citations
7.
Larocque, Guy R., Francine Tremblay, Robert D. Boutin, et al.. (2010). Juvenile productivity of five hybrid poplar clones and 20 genetically improved white and Norway spruces in boreal clay-belt of Quebec, Canada. The Forestry Chronicle. 86(2). 225–233. 4 indexed citations
8.
Thompson, Stacey Lee, Manuel Lamothe, Patrick G. Meirmans, Pierre Périnet, & Nathalie Isabel. (2009). Repeated unidirectional introgression towardsPopulus balsamiferain contact zones of exotic and native poplars. Molecular Ecology. 19(1). 132–145. 68 indexed citations
9.
Paquette, Alain, Christian Messier, Pierre Périnet, & Alain Cogliastro. (2008). Simulating Light Availability under Different Hybrid Poplar Clones in a Mixed Intensive Plantation System. Forest Science. 54(5). 481–489. 16 indexed citations
10.
Yu, Qibin, et al.. (2008). Variation in Mechanical Properties of Selected Young Poplar Hybrid Crosses. Forest Science. 54(3). 255–259. 16 indexed citations
11.
12.
Meirmans, Patrick G., Manuel Lamothe, Pierre Périnet, & Nathalie Isabel. (2007). Species-specific single nucleotide polymorphism markers for detecting hybridization and introgression in poplarThis article is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Poplar Research in Canada.. Canadian Journal of Botany. 85(11). 1082–1091. 22 indexed citations
13.
Périnet, Pierre, et al.. (2006). Genetic Relationships among species of Populus (Salicaceae) based on nuclear genomic data1. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 133(4). 519–527. 30 indexed citations
14.
Pliūra, Alfas, et al.. (2005). Variation in Wood Density and Shrinkage and Their Relationship to Growth of Selected Young Poplar Hybrid Crosses. Forest Science. 51(5). 472–482. 51 indexed citations
15.
Khasa, Damase P., et al.. (2005). Species‐specific microsatellite markers to monitor gene flow between exotic poplars and their natural relatives in eastern North America. Molecular Ecology Notes. 5(4). 920–923. 18 indexed citations
16.
Périnet, Pierre, et al.. (1998). The second generation seed orchard research project at the Direction de la recherche forestière in Québec. The Forestry Chronicle. 74(2). 181–184. 3 indexed citations
17.
Hendrickson, O. Q., et al.. (1993). Effects of Frankia on field performance of Alnus clones and seedlings. Plant and Soil. 150(2). 295–302. 12 indexed citations
18.
Périnet, Pierre, et al.. (1985). Large scale inoculation of actinorhizal plants withFrankia. Plant and Soil. 87(1). 175–183. 20 indexed citations
19.
Périnet, Pierre & M. Lalonde. (1983). Axenic nodulation of in vitro propagated Alnus glutinosa plantlets by Frankia strains. Canadian Journal of Botany. 61(11). 2883–2888. 5 indexed citations
20.
Périnet, Pierre & M. Lalonde. (1983). In vitro propagation and nodulation of the actinorhizal host plant Alnus glutinosa (L.) gaertn. Plant Science Letters. 29(1). 9–17. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Henrik R. Hallingbäck Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeremy Brawner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alfas Pliūra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karl‐Anders Högberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brian S. Baltunis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dean W. Einspahr Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Henson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brian J. Stanton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matti Haapanen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aurélio Mendes Aguiar
Rankless by CCL
2026