Pierre Bommel

1.5k total citations
47 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Pierre Bommel is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Pierre Bommel has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 12 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 9 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Pierre Bommel's work include Agriculture and Rural Development Research (11 papers), Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (9 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (6 papers). Pierre Bommel is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture and Rural Development Research (11 papers), Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (9 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (6 papers). Pierre Bommel collaborates with scholars based in France, Brazil and Costa Rica. Pierre Bommel's co-authors include Christophe Le Page, François Bousquet, Klaus Hubacek, Todd K. BenDor, Pierre D. Glynn, Raphaèle Ducrot, Rebecca Jordan, Eleanor J. Sterling, Laura Schmitt Olabisi and Moira Zellner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Ecological Applications and Global Environmental Change.

In The Last Decade

Pierre Bommel

42 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pierre Bommel France 11 178 86 76 69 64 47 484
Benjamin L. Turner United States 14 118 0.7× 91 1.1× 78 1.0× 90 1.3× 29 0.5× 39 551
Sharon Pollard South Africa 12 226 1.3× 78 0.9× 40 0.5× 117 1.7× 95 1.5× 28 584
Nagesh Kolagani India 8 310 1.7× 177 2.1× 49 0.6× 50 0.7× 69 1.1× 16 673
Christian Troost Germany 13 195 1.1× 54 0.6× 188 2.5× 71 1.0× 43 0.7× 27 671
D.H. Walker Australia 14 203 1.1× 38 0.4× 140 1.8× 59 0.9× 53 0.8× 30 690
Boubaker Dhehibi Tunisia 13 42 0.2× 88 1.0× 86 1.1× 77 1.1× 39 0.6× 94 689
Hugh Kelley Ireland 11 286 1.6× 48 0.6× 27 0.4× 71 1.0× 84 1.3× 18 687
George Cojocaru United Kingdom 7 253 1.4× 35 0.4× 117 1.5× 46 0.7× 39 0.6× 11 409
Martine Antona France 13 463 2.6× 80 0.9× 125 1.6× 88 1.3× 188 2.9× 46 807
Steve Polasky Netherlands 2 292 1.6× 64 0.7× 26 0.3× 85 1.2× 110 1.7× 3 535

Countries citing papers authored by Pierre Bommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre Bommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre Bommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre Bommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre Bommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre Bommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre Bommel. The network helps show where Pierre Bommel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pierre Bommel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pierre Bommel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pierre Bommel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pierre Bommel. Pierre Bommel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bommel, Pierre, et al.. (2025). Trace of change: How stigmergy maps social learning loops in Companion Modeling through participatory simulation. Journal of Environmental Management. 383. 125292–125292. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jordan, Rebecca, Steven Gray, Moira Zellner, et al.. (2018). Twelve Questions for the Participatory Modeling Community. Earth s Future. 6(8). 1046–1057. 71 indexed citations
3.
Gray, Steven A., et al.. (2016). Purpose, Processes, Partnerships, and Products: 4Ps to advance Participatory Socio-Environmental Modeling. Agritrop (Cirad). 2016. 2 indexed citations
4.
Leclerc, Grégoire, et al.. (2016). Challenges for involving water stakeholders in educational and decision-making participatory processes supported by ABM. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 1 indexed citations
5.
Bommel, Pierre, et al.. (2015). Use of simulations to enhance knowledge integration and livestock producers’ adaptation to variability in the climate in northern Uruguay. The Rangeland Journal. 37(4). 425–432. 2 indexed citations
6.
Bommel, Pierre, et al.. (2014). A Further Step Towards Participatory Modelling. Fostering Stakeholder Involvement in Designing Models by Using Executable UML. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 17(1). 10 indexed citations
7.
Sichman, Jaime Simão, et al.. (2012). An Overview of Social Simulation Research in Brazil. Agritrop (Cirad). 1534. 18–22. 3 indexed citations
8.
Bommel, Pierre, et al.. (2012). Local knowledge, agents and models for the adaptation to climatic variability of livestock farmers in Uruguay.. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bommel, Pierre, Christophe Le Page, Nicolas Bécu, & François Bousquet. (2012). Cormas (2012 release) Common-pool Resources and Multi-Agents Systems : Building a Cormas model from scratch step by step: the ECEC model. Agritrop (Cirad).
10.
Bommel, Pierre, et al.. (2012). Modelización de una explotación ganadera extensiva criadora en basalto. Agrociencia. 16(2). 120–130. 7 indexed citations
11.
Ducrot, Raphaèle, et al.. (2011). Learning to manage quality in a multiple reservoir system: Contribution of a companion modelling approach. Water SA. 37(1). 2 indexed citations
12.
Bousquet, François, et al.. (2011). Markets as communication systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 22(1). 161–201. 6 indexed citations
13.
Bommel, Pierre, et al.. (2011). One more step towards participatory modeling. Involving local stakeholders in designing scientific models for participative foresight studies. Agritrop (Cirad). 1 indexed citations
14.
Lescoat, Philippe, et al.. (2010). How to link poultry industry and territory for a sustainable development? An interesting question to learn and practise transdisciplinarity.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 492–499. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bommel, Pierre, et al.. (2010). Modéliser le changement dans la gestion des terres de parcours en Uruguay. Cahiers Agricultures. 19(2). 112–117. 7 indexed citations
17.
Farolfi, Stefano, et al.. (2008). Combining multi-agent simulations and cost-benefit analysis to evaluate policy options for the management of livestock effluents in Réunion Island. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 3(10). 650–666. 1 indexed citations
18.
Promburom, Panomsak & Pierre Bommel. (2005). Participatory multi-agent system modelling for collective watershed management in northern Thailand : a companion modeling method. Agritrop (Cirad). 1 indexed citations
19.
Michel, Fabien, Pierre Bommel, & Jacques Ferber. (2002). Simulation distribuée interactive sous MadKit. Agritrop (Cirad). 175–178.
20.
Bommel, Pierre & Sylvie Lardon. (2000). Un simulateur pour explorer les interactions entre dynamiques de végétation et de pâturage : impact des stratégies sur les configurations spatiales. Agritrop (Cirad). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026