Phoebe Moore

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 776 citations indexed

About

Phoebe Moore is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Phoebe Moore has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 776 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Phoebe Moore's work include Digital Economy and Work Transformation (15 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (8 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers). Phoebe Moore is often cited by papers focused on Digital Economy and Work Transformation (15 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (8 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers). Phoebe Moore collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Phoebe Moore's co-authors include Andrew Robinson, Simon Joyce, Lukasz Piwek, Martin Upchurch, Arlene B. Tickner, Jamie Woodcock, P. A. M. Taylor, Athina Karatzogianni, Owen Worth and Kirsten Forkert and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Organization Studies and New Media & Society.

In The Last Decade

Phoebe Moore

37 papers receiving 720 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace

2015 222 citations Phoebe Moore et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Phoebe Moore United Kingdom	13	484	166	101	90	83	39	776
Karen Gregory United Kingdom	7	386 0.8×	95 0.6×	146 1.4×	29 0.3×	38 0.5×	19	608
Ned Rossiter Australia	11	486 1.0×	213 1.3×	35 0.3×	16 0.2×	182 2.2×	47	902
Andreas Wittel United Kingdom	8	533 1.1×	40 0.2×	113 1.1×	17 0.2×	48 0.6×	16	870
Jeremy Aroles United Kingdom	12	277 0.6×	53 0.3×	100 1.0×	20 0.2×	33 0.4×	37	589
Diana R. Sanchez United States	10	253 0.5×	54 0.3×	27 0.3×	49 0.5×	19 0.2×	22	965
Harley Shaiken United States	11	339 0.7×	136 0.8×	15 0.1×	40 0.4×	87 1.0×	22	1.1k
Niels van Doorn Netherlands	18	1.3k 2.7×	399 2.4×	764 7.6×	51 0.6×	70 0.8×	32	1.6k
Karen Dale United Kingdom	16	409 0.8×	79 0.5×	41 0.4×	14 0.2×	58 0.7×	30	1.1k
Theodore E. Zorn New Zealand	19	349 0.7×	75 0.5×	41 0.4×	14 0.2×	38 0.5×	48	1.0k
Danna Greenberg United States	18	368 0.8×	86 0.5×	63 0.6×	19 0.2×	53 0.6×	37	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe Moore

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe Moore

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe Moore. The network helps show where Phoebe Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phoebe Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phoebe Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phoebe Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phoebe Moore. Phoebe Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Moore, Phoebe. (2023). Workers’ right to the subject: The social relations of data production. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 30(3). 1076–1098. 3 indexed citations

2.

Moore, Phoebe, et al.. (2023). Making algorithmic management safe and healthy for workers: Addressing psychosocial risks in new legal provisions. European Labour Law Journal. 14(2). 192–210. 2 indexed citations

3.

Moore, Phoebe. (2022). Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production. 1(2). 257–270. 2 indexed citations

4.

Moore, Phoebe, et al.. (2022). Advancing arguments on technology, work and the body, in the global political economy. 1(1). 108–121. 2 indexed citations

5.

Moore, Phoebe. (2020). AI Trainers: Who is the Smart Worker today?. SSRN Electronic Journal.

6.

Moore, Phoebe. (2020). The mirror for (artificial) intelligence in capitalism. Capital & Class. 44(2). 191–200. 2 indexed citations

7.

Moore, Phoebe. (2020). Who is the "smart worker"? Who should she be?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(2). 1 indexed citations

8.

Moore, Phoebe & Simon Joyce. (2019). Black box or hidden abode? The expansion and exposure of platform work managerialism. Review of International Political Economy. 27(4). 926–948. 76 indexed citations

9.

Moore, Phoebe. (2019). The Mirror for (Artificial) Intelligence: In Whose Reflection?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

10.

Moore, Phoebe. (2018). Tracking Affective Labour for Agility in the Quantified Workplace. Body & Society. 24(3). 39–67. 45 indexed citations

11.

Moore, Phoebe, et al.. (2017). The Psycho-Social Impacts of Technological Change in Contemporary Workplaces and Trade Union Responses. Figshare. 17 indexed citations

12.

Moore, Phoebe & Lukasz Piwek. (2017). Regulating wellbeing in the brave new quantified workplace. Employee Relations. 39(3). 308–316. 64 indexed citations

13.

Moore, Phoebe, et al.. (2016). The campaign for digital citizenship. Soundings. 62(62). 107–120. 4 indexed citations

14.

Moore, Phoebe, et al.. (2015). Guest Editors' Introduction: The Future and Praxis of Decent Work. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(2). 4 indexed citations

15.

Moore, Phoebe. (2014). Legitimacy, Tribridity, and Decent Work Deficits. Globalizations. 11(3). 315–330. 2 indexed citations

16.

Moore, Phoebe. (2012). Where is the study of work in critical IPE?. International Politics. 49(2). 215–237. 7 indexed citations

17.

Moore, Phoebe. (2009). UK education, employability, and everyday life. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 7(1). 242–274. 8 indexed citations

18.

Worth, Owen & Phoebe Moore. (2009). Globalization and the 'New' Semi-Peripheries. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 11 indexed citations

19.

Moore, Phoebe & P. A. M. Taylor. (2009). Exploitation of the self in community-based software production: Workers' freedoms or firm foundations?. Capital & Class. 33(1). 99–119. 17 indexed citations

20.

Moore, Phoebe. (2007). Globalisation and Labour Struggle in Asia: A Neo-Gramscian Critique of South Korea's Political Economy. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact