Philomen Probert

960 total citations
16 papers, 106 citations indexed

About

Philomen Probert is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Anthropology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philomen Probert has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 106 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Language and Linguistics, 4 papers in Anthropology and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philomen Probert's work include Linguistics and language evolution (14 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers). Philomen Probert is often cited by papers focused on Linguistics and language evolution (14 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers). Philomen Probert collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Cyprus. Philomen Probert's co-authors include Andreas Willi, Eleanor Dickey and Barbara McGillivray and has published in prestigious journals such as Language and Linguistics Compass, The Journal of Hellenic Studies and Transactions of the Philological Society.

In The Last Decade

Philomen Probert

10 papers receiving 84 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philomen Probert United Kingdom 5 83 24 23 18 16 16 106
Michael Meier-Brügger 5 83 1.0× 19 0.8× 20 0.9× 16 0.9× 17 1.1× 11 106
Helma Dik United States 5 62 0.7× 12 0.5× 28 1.2× 22 1.2× 11 0.7× 6 89
Martin Joachim Kümmel Germany 4 89 1.1× 19 0.8× 10 0.4× 38 2.1× 31 1.9× 18 105
Jared S. Klein United States 7 151 1.8× 28 1.2× 14 0.6× 23 1.3× 36 2.3× 42 179
Gerrigje Wakker France 6 41 0.5× 24 1.0× 40 1.7× 10 0.6× 10 0.6× 19 89
Klaas Bentein Belgium 7 101 1.2× 9 0.4× 14 0.6× 12 0.7× 20 1.3× 35 128
Helmut Rix 7 147 1.8× 50 2.1× 33 1.4× 27 1.5× 29 1.8× 16 179
Eleanor Coghill Germany 5 50 0.6× 14 0.6× 9 0.4× 6 0.3× 10 0.6× 13 53
Rutger J. Allan Netherlands 5 60 0.7× 9 0.4× 20 0.9× 29 1.6× 11 0.7× 11 85
Matthew M. Reeve China 5 51 0.6× 8 0.3× 6 0.3× 15 0.8× 19 1.2× 26 93

Countries citing papers authored by Philomen Probert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philomen Probert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philomen Probert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philomen Probert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philomen Probert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philomen Probert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philomen Probert. The network helps show where Philomen Probert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philomen Probert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philomen Probert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philomen Probert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philomen Probert. Philomen Probert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Probert, Philomen, et al.. (2019). The Invention of the Greek Prosodic Signs. The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 139. 125–146.
2.
Probert, Philomen. (2019). Latin Grammarians on the Latin Accent. Oxford University Press eBooks.
4.
Probert, Philomen, et al.. (2019). Vector space models of Ancient Greek word meaning, and a case study on Homer. Apollo (University of Cambridge). 4 indexed citations
5.
Probert, Philomen. (2016). Zeus on the stud farm? Against a Homeric instance of attractio relativi. Mnemosyne. 69(3). 365–381.
6.
Probert, Philomen & Eleanor Dickey. (2015). The ‘Ϝhεδιέστας’ inscription from Archaic Argos (SEG 11:314): a reconsideration. The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 135. 110–131. 1 indexed citations
7.
Probert, Philomen. (2015). Early Greek Relative Clauses. 19 indexed citations
8.
Probert, Philomen & Andreas Willi. (2012). Laws and Rules in Indo‐European. Oxford University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations
9.
Probert, Philomen. (2009). Ancient Greek Accentuation in Generative Phonology and Optimality Theory. Language and Linguistics Compass. 4(1). 1–26. 2 indexed citations
10.
Probert, Philomen. (2008). Mycenaean o- is accusative; jo- is nominative. 84(1-4). 126–168. 3 indexed citations
11.
Probert, Philomen. (2006). Ancient Greek accentuation : synchronic patterns, frequency effects, and prehistory. Oxford University Press eBooks. 22 indexed citations
12.
Probert, Philomen. (2006). Clause boundaries in Old Hittite relative sentences1. Transactions of the Philological Society. 104(1). 17–83. 15 indexed citations
13.
Probert, Philomen. (2006). Ancient Greek Accentuation. 19 indexed citations
15.
Probert, Philomen. (2003). A new short guide to the accentuation of ancient Greek. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 16 indexed citations
16.
Probert, Philomen. (2001). Greek Prosody. The Classical Review. 51(1). 87–88. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026