Phillip Garner

411 total citations
14 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

Phillip Garner is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Phillip Garner has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Recurrent topics in Phillip Garner's work include Economic Growth and Productivity (9 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers) and Economic Policies and Impacts (5 papers). Phillip Garner is often cited by papers focused on Economic Growth and Productivity (9 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers) and Economic Policies and Impacts (5 papers). Phillip Garner collaborates with scholars based in United States and Pakistan. Phillip Garner's co-authors include Azam Chaudhry and Enrico Spolaore and has published in prestigious journals such as The Economic Journal, Economics Letters and Economic Modelling.

In The Last Decade

Phillip Garner

12 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Phillip Garner United States	6	114	56	48	42	25	14	195
Silvio Borner Switzerland	8	107 0.9×	62 1.1×	59 1.2×	82 2.0×	18 0.7×	25	240
George Manolas Greece	6	233 2.0×	83 1.5×	37 0.8×	39 0.9×	17 0.7×	9	338
David J. Bulman United States	8	124 1.1×	59 1.1×	57 1.2×	73 1.7×	7 0.3×	21	240
Maksym Ivanyna United States	9	195 1.7×	79 1.4×	44 0.9×	64 1.5×	9 0.4×	26	285
Marek Hanusch United States	9	132 1.2×	50 0.9×	44 0.9×	73 1.7×	8 0.3×	37	254
Harinder Kohli United States	6	164 1.4×	50 0.9×	89 1.9×	62 1.5×	5 0.2×	10	265
Stefan Markowski Australia	10	112 1.0×	54 1.0×	36 0.8×	64 1.5×	13 0.5×	44	237
Masaaki Higashijima Japan	8	90 0.8×	116 2.1×	66 1.4×	92 2.2×	18 0.7×	31	263
Björn Alecke Germany	9	233 2.0×	37 0.7×	39 0.8×	75 1.8×	16 0.6×	25	291
Andrew Stone United States	5	119 1.0×	81 1.4×	40 0.8×	21 0.5×	12 0.5×	9	224

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Garner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Garner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Garner. The network helps show where Phillip Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Garner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Garner. Phillip Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Chaudhry, Azam & Phillip Garner. (2012). The political economy of income comparisons and economic growth. Economic Modelling. 31. 214–222. 2 indexed citations

2.

Garner, Phillip. (2009). A note on endogenous growth and scale effects. Economics Letters. 106(2). 98–100. 4 indexed citations

3.

Garner, Phillip. (2007). Congo and Korea: a study in divergence. Journal of International Development. 20(3). 326–346. 4 indexed citations

4.

Garner, Phillip. (2007). Productivity Revolutions and Science Driven Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

5.

Chaudhry, Azam & Phillip Garner. (2007). DO GOVERNMENTS SUPPRESS GROWTH? INSTITUTIONS, RENT‐SEEKING, AND INNOVATION BLOCKING IN A MODEL OF SCHUMPETERIAN GROWTH. Economics and Politics. 19(1). 35–52. 26 indexed citations

6.

Garner, Phillip. (2006). Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. 11 indexed citations

7.

Garner, Phillip. (2006). Congo and Korea: A Case Study in Divergence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

8.

Chaudhry, Azam & Phillip Garner. (2006). Growth With Income Comparisons And Status-Quo Biased Policies. SSRN Electronic Journal.

9.

Chaudhry, Azam & Phillip Garner. (2006). Political Competition Between Countries and Economic Growth. Review of Development Economics. 10(4). 666–682. 22 indexed citations

10.

Garner, Phillip & Enrico Spolaore. (2005). Why chads? Determinants of voting equipment use in the United States. Public Choice. 123(3-4). 363–392. 11 indexed citations

11.

Garner, Phillip. (2005). Reversal in Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

12.

Garner, Phillip. (2004). In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. The Economic Journal. 114(499). F547–F549. 104 indexed citations

13.

Chaudhry, Azam & Phillip Garner. (2004). Do Governments Suppress Growth?: Institutions, Rent-Seeking, and Innovation Blocking in a Model of Schumpeterian Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

14.

Chaudhry, Azam & Phillip Garner. (2002). Political Competition Between Countries and Economic Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact