Philip Wright

38 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Philip Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Rehabilitation 96
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 141
  • Radiation 66
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 9
  • Dermatology 51
Replace Sigrid Whiteside with:
Sigrid Whiteside United Kingdom
Lee Y South Korea
Ron Hazani United States
Vinodh A. Kumar United States
Ernest W.N. Lam Canada
Christoph Leitner Austria
Roger A. Meyer United States
Hisashi Taniguchi Japan
Mohamadreza Aghamirsalim Iran
James Newman United States
Philip Wright relative to Sigrid Whiteside United Kingdom Sigrid Whiteside's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.1×
Sigrid Whiteside · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Wright. The network helps show where Philip Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Wright Line = papers co-authored together Philip Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201167
2 200757
3 200055
4 200752
5 201847
6 201246
7 201433
8 199930
9 201027
10 200827
11 199918
12 199915
13 201014
14
Intratumoral vaccination of adenoviruses expressing fusion protein RM4/tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha induces significant tumor regression.
199914
15 200011
16 202211
17 20138
18 20077
19 19517
20 20056

About Philip Wright

Philip Wright is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Rehabilitation, Dermatology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 40 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (4 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (3 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (96 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (141 citations), Radiation (66 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (9 citations) and Dermatology (51 citations). Philip Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Granat, J. C. Moore, Salim Ahmed, Hugh D. Goold, Deborah Hailstones, Ian Swain, Ray Fitzpatrick, Christopher Morris, Kristin Liabo and Tom Lister. Their work appears in journals such as Lasers in Medical Science, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Cancers, Clinical Rehabilitation and Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026