Philip T. Seaton

459 total citations
10 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Philip T. Seaton is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip T. Seaton has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 6 papers in Plant Science and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Philip T. Seaton's work include Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (3 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers). Philip T. Seaton is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (3 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers). Philip T. Seaton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and China. Philip T. Seaton's co-authors include Hugh W. Pritchard, Hong Hu, Nelson Barbosa Machado Neto, Ceci Castilho Custódio, H. W. Pritchard, T. R. Marks, Margaret Ramsay, Jayanthi Nadarajan and Rodrigo B. Singer and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Botany, The Botanical Review and PROTOPLASMA.

In The Last Decade

Philip T. Seaton

9 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Philip T. Seaton
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 221
  • Plant Science 199
  • Molecular Biology 179
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 58
  • Ecological Modeling 26
Anna Jakubska-Busse Poland
Alfonso Garmendia Spain
M.S.M. Sosef Netherlands
T. C. G. Rich United Kingdom
Oyetola O. Oyebanji Nigeria
Tim Wing Yam Singapore
Tilo Henning Germany
Gilberto Ocampo Mexico
Alessandra Ike Coan Brazil
Warren Cardinal‐McTeague Canada
Anna Jakubska-Busse Poland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip T. Seaton
Philip T. Seaton · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip T. Seaton
Philip T. Seaton · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip T. Seaton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip T. Seaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip T. Seaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip T. Seaton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip T. Seaton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip T. Seaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip T. Seaton. The network helps show where Philip T. Seaton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip T. Seaton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip T. Seaton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip T. Seaton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip T. Seaton. Philip T. Seaton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 8
4 19
5
Nutritional requirements for in vitro seed germination of 12 terrestrial, lithophytic and epiphytic orchids.
14
6 49
7 78
8 103
9
Growing Orchids from Seed
13
10
Interspecific variation in orchid seed longevity in relation to ultra-dry storage and cryopreservation
52

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026