Philip T. Sandstrom

550 total citations
14 papers, 460 citations indexed

About

Philip T. Sandstrom is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip T. Sandstrom has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 460 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 10 papers in Ecology and 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Philip T. Sandstrom's work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (14 papers), Marine and fisheries research (8 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (5 papers). Philip T. Sandstrom is often cited by papers focused on Fish Ecology and Management Studies (14 papers), Marine and fisheries research (8 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (5 papers). Philip T. Sandstrom collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Czechia. Philip T. Sandstrom's co-authors include A. Peter Klimley, Arnold J. Ammann, Patricia L. Brandes, John R. Skalski, Russell W. Perry, Gabriel P. Singer, Steven T. Lindley, Eric D. Chapman, Cyril J. Michel and R. Bruce MacFarlane and has published in prestigious journals such as Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society and North American Journal of Fisheries Management.

In The Last Decade

Philip T. Sandstrom

14 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip T. Sandstrom United States 9 432 303 192 104 42 14 460
Eric D. Chapman United States 12 399 0.9× 274 0.9× 197 1.0× 84 0.8× 55 1.3× 24 445
Patricia L. Brandes United States 14 555 1.3× 410 1.4× 246 1.3× 166 1.6× 32 0.8× 17 603
Justin A. Chiotti United States 13 338 0.8× 273 0.9× 63 0.3× 82 0.8× 53 1.3× 27 380
Luis A. Vélez‐Espino Canada 13 309 0.7× 239 0.8× 135 0.7× 44 0.4× 75 1.8× 15 423
Gabriel P. Singer United States 10 330 0.8× 223 0.7× 172 0.9× 68 0.7× 37 0.9× 22 347
Edmund A. Halfyard Canada 11 325 0.8× 266 0.9× 172 0.9× 26 0.3× 52 1.2× 18 379
Charles E. Petrosky United States 11 556 1.3× 331 1.1× 170 0.9× 150 1.4× 111 2.6× 20 593
Mariska Obedzinski United States 10 200 0.5× 137 0.5× 91 0.5× 79 0.8× 57 1.4× 17 278
Charles S. Anderson United States 11 361 0.8× 240 0.8× 128 0.7× 45 0.4× 126 3.0× 24 441
Andrew Kahnle United States 10 313 0.7× 237 0.8× 178 0.9× 18 0.2× 67 1.6× 12 382

Countries citing papers authored by Philip T. Sandstrom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip T. Sandstrom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip T. Sandstrom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip T. Sandstrom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip T. Sandstrom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip T. Sandstrom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip T. Sandstrom. The network helps show where Philip T. Sandstrom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip T. Sandstrom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip T. Sandstrom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip T. Sandstrom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip T. Sandstrom. Philip T. Sandstrom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Gresswell, Robert E., et al.. (2021). Invasive Lake Trout Reproduction in Yellowstone Lake under an Active Suppression Program. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 150(5). 637–650. 2 indexed citations
2.
Gutowsky, Lee F.G., Jason G. Romine, Patricia E. Bigelow, et al.. (2020). Revealing migration and reproductive habitat of invasive fish under an active population suppression program. Conservation Science and Practice. 2(3). 14 indexed citations
3.
Sandstrom, Philip T., Arnold J. Ammann, Cyril J. Michel, et al.. (2020). Low river survival of juvenile steelhead in the Sacramento River watershed. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 103(5). 531–541. 3 indexed citations
4.
McInturf, Alexandra G., et al.. (2019). Use of a hydrodynamic model to examine behavioral response of broadnose sevengill sharks (Notorynchus cepedianus) to estuarine tidal flow. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 102(9). 1149–1159. 5 indexed citations
5.
Sommer, Ted, et al.. (2018). Survival of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Yolo Bypass and the Lower Sacramento River, California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 16(2). 13 indexed citations
6.
Michel, Cyril J., Arnold J. Ammann, Steven T. Lindley, et al.. (2015). Chinook salmon outmigration survival in wet and dry years in California’s Sacramento River. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 72(11). 1749–1759. 78 indexed citations
7.
Perry, Russell W., Patricia L. Brandes, Jon R. Burau, Philip T. Sandstrom, & John R. Skalski. (2015). Effect of Tides, River Flow, and Gate Operations on Entrainment of Juvenile Salmon into the Interior Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 144(3). 445–455. 28 indexed citations
8.
Sandstrom, Philip T., et al.. (2012). Survival and movement patterns of central California coast native steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Napa River. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 96(2-3). 287–302. 8 indexed citations
9.
Sandstrom, Philip T., R. Bruce MacFarlane, Steven T. Lindley, & A. Peter Klimley. (2012). An introduction to the use of electronic tagging to provide insights into salmon migration and survival. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 96(2-3). 131–133. 1 indexed citations
10.
Chapman, Eric D., Alex Hearn, Cyril J. Michel, et al.. (2012). Diel movements of out-migrating Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) smolts in the Sacramento/San Joaquin watershed. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 96(2-3). 273–286. 53 indexed citations
11.
Sandstrom, Philip T., et al.. (2012). Migration route selection of juvenile Chinook salmon at the Delta Cross Channel, and the role of water velocity and individual movement patterns. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 96(2-3). 215–224. 23 indexed citations
12.
Sandstrom, Philip T., Arnold J. Ammann, Cyril J. Michel, et al.. (2012). Growth, survival, and tag retention of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and its application to survival estimates. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 96(2-3). 145–164. 33 indexed citations
13.
Michel, Cyril J., Arnold J. Ammann, Eric D. Chapman, et al.. (2012). The effects of environmental factors on the migratory movement patterns of Sacramento River yearling late-fall run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Environmental Biology of Fishes. 96(2-3). 257–271. 45 indexed citations
14.
Perry, Russell W., John R. Skalski, Patricia L. Brandes, et al.. (2010). Estimating Survival and Migration Route Probabilities of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 30(1). 142–156. 154 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026