Philip Shearman

525 total citations
9 papers, 382 citations indexed

About

Philip Shearman is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Earth-Surface Processes. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Shearman has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 382 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Ecology, 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 3 papers in Earth-Surface Processes. Recurrent topics in Philip Shearman's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Geological formations and processes (3 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (3 papers). Philip Shearman is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Geological formations and processes (3 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (3 papers). Philip Shearman collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom. Philip Shearman's co-authors include Jane Bryan, David Knapp, Gregory P. Asner, William F. Laurance, J. P. Walsh, Keith Barney, Horst Weyerhaeuser, Christopher M. Barr, Gary Bull and Fredrich Kahrl and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Conservation and AMBIO.

In The Last Decade

Philip Shearman

8 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip Shearman Australia	6	180	167	85	36	34	9	382
R Rohde South Africa	11	167 0.9×	112 0.7×	96 1.1×	56 1.6×	14 0.4×	18	449
Nora Devoe United States	6	180 1.0×	249 1.5×	153 1.8×	24 0.7×	22 0.6×	12	373
Christian Niel Berlinck Brazil	9	353 2.0×	186 1.1×	147 1.7×	66 1.8×	14 0.4×	25	500
Jane Bryan Australia	10	310 1.7×	257 1.5×	160 1.9×	78 2.2×	29 0.9×	11	602
Frédéric Bioret France	11	94 0.5×	120 0.7×	86 1.0×	86 2.4×	14 0.4×	65	340
N.M. Moleele Botswana	9	193 1.1×	212 1.3×	192 2.3×	58 1.6×	10 0.3×	9	507
Anne Branthomme Italy	6	334 1.9×	231 1.4×	132 1.6×	42 1.2×	10 0.3×	7	505
Rodolfo Rioja‐Nieto Mexico	11	171 0.9×	322 1.9×	44 0.5×	22 0.6×	25 0.7×	29	430
Asako Miyamoto Japan	8	182 1.0×	127 0.8×	73 0.9×	43 1.2×	6 0.2×	23	314
Roy S. Wittkuhn Australia	11	384 2.1×	202 1.2×	223 2.6×	61 1.7×	11 0.3×	15	491

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Shearman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Shearman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Shearman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Shearman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Shearman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Shearman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Shearman. The network helps show where Philip Shearman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Shearman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Shearman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Shearman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Shearman. Philip Shearman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Sam, Kateřina, et al.. (2024). Reorganization of bird communities along a rainforest elevation gradient during a strong El Niño event in Papua New Guinea. Ecology and Evolution. 14(5). e10955–e10955.

2.

Bryan, Jane, et al.. (2013). Extreme Differences in Forest Degradation in Borneo: Comparing Practices in Sarawak, Sabah, and Brunei. PLoS ONE. 8(7). e69679–e69679. 190 indexed citations

3.

Shearman, Philip, Jane Bryan, & J. P. Walsh. (2013). Trends in Deltaic Change over Three Decades in the Asia-Pacific Region. Journal of Coastal Research. 29(5). 1169–1169. 40 indexed citations

4.

Shearman, Philip, Jane Bryan, & William F. Laurance. (2012). Are we approaching ‘peak timber’ in the tropics?. Biological Conservation. 151(1). 17–21. 80 indexed citations

5.

Chappell, Nick A., et al.. (2011). River sediment monitoring for baseline and change characterisation: A new management tool for the Ramu River Communities in Papua New Guinea. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 1 indexed citations

6.

Bryan, Jane, JB Kirkpatrick, Philip Shearman, & J Ash. (2011). On estimating tropical forest carbon dynamics in Papua New Guinea. Annals of Forest Science. 68(2). 213–216. 3 indexed citations

7.

Shearman, Philip. (2010). Recent Change in the Extent of Mangroves in the Northern Gulf of Papua, Papua New Guinea. AMBIO. 39(2). 181–189. 23 indexed citations

8.

Shearman, Philip, et al.. (2010). Deforestation and degradation in Papua New Guinea: a response to Filer and colleagues, 2009. Annals of Forest Science. 67(3). 300–300. 10 indexed citations

9.

Bull, Gary, A. White, Christopher M. Barr, et al.. (2004). The China Forest Products Trade: Overview of Asia-Pacific Supplying Countries, Impacts and Implications. The International Forestry Review. 6(3). 237–253. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact