Philip R. Frederick

928 total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 698 citations indexed

About

Philip R. Frederick is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip R. Frederick has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 698 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 6 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Philip R. Frederick's work include Radiology practices and education (6 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (4 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers). Philip R. Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Radiology practices and education (6 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (4 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers). Philip R. Frederick collaborates with scholars based in United States. Philip R. Frederick's co-authors include Frank G. Yanowitz, Arthur D. Hagan, Bruce E. Bray, Hiram W. Marshall, Joan R. Lutz, Frederick L. Datz, S C Klausner, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Peter J. Haug and Dennis L. Parker and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Radiology and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Philip R. Frederick

23 papers receiving 630 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Randomized Trial of Intracoronary Streptokinase in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction

1983 411 citations Jeffrey L. Anderson, Hiram W. Marshall et al. New England Journal of Medicine profile →

Peers

Philip R. Frederick

CCM

RNMI

SURGE

MB

AI

Joseph B. Leader United States

Fima Macheret United States

Dustin N. Hartzel United States

Jeremy R. Burt United States

Markku Eskola Finland

Valeria Cantoni Italy

Elizabeth Le United Kingdom

J Fan China

Caterina Beatrice Monti Italy

Peter MacEneaney United States

Joseph B. Leader United States

Philip R. Frederick

296 ×0.9

CCM

88 ×0.3

RNMI

112 ×0.5

SURGE

133 ×1.4

MB

52 ×0.6

AI

Citations per year, relative to Philip R. Frederick Philip R. Frederick (= 1×) peers Joseph B. Leader

Countries citing papers authored by Philip R. Frederick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip R. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip R. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip R. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip R. Frederick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip R. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip R. Frederick. The network helps show where Philip R. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip R. Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip R. Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip R. Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip R. Frederick. Philip R. Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Frederick, Philip R., et al.. (2016). Epibulbar Nodular Fasciitis. Case Reports in Ophthalmology. 7(1). 262–267. 2 indexed citations

2.

Chapman, Wendy W., Marcelo Fiszman, Philip R. Frederick, Brian E. Chapman, & Peter J. Haug. (2001). Quantifying the Characteristics of Unambiguous Chest Radiography Reports in the Context of Pneumonia. Academic Radiology. 8(1). 57–66. 13 indexed citations

3.

Fiszman, Marcelo, Peter J. Haug, & Philip R. Frederick. (1998). Automatic extraction of PIOPED interpretations from ventilation/perfusion lung scan reports.. PubMed. 860–4. 27 indexed citations

4.

Haug, Peter J., et al.. (1997). Developing a radiology data base for quality assurance. Journal of Digital Imaging. 10(S1). 103–108. 6 indexed citations

5.

Wiersema, Maurits, et al.. (1995). Evaluation of patients with known or suspected Malignancy (M): comparison of CT and EUS with Fine Needle Aspiration biopsy (FNA). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 41(4). 315–315. 11 indexed citations

6.

Wiersema, Maurits, et al.. (1995). Cost effectiveness of eus with Fine Needle Aspiration biopsy (FNA) in evaluating patients with Pancreatic Malignancy (PM). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 41(4). 315–315. 3 indexed citations

7.

Haug, Peter J., T. Allan Pryor, & Philip R. Frederick. (1992). Integrating Radiology and Hospital Information Systems: the advantage of shared data.. PubMed. 187–91. 5 indexed citations

8.

Haug, Peter J., Paul D. Clayton, Irena Tocino, et al.. (1991). Chest radiography: a tool for the audit of report quality.. Radiology. 180(1). 271–276. 8 indexed citations

9.

Haug, Peter J., et al.. (1990). Computerized extraction of coded findings from free-text radiologic reports. Work in progress.. Radiology. 174(2). 543–548. 78 indexed citations

10.

Parker, Dennis L., Gary R. Caputo, & Philip R. Frederick. (1989). Efficient biphasic spin‐echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 11(1). 98–113. 3 indexed citations

11.

Frederick, Philip R., et al.. (1989). Coaxial needles for repeated biopsy sampling.. Radiology. 170(1). 273–274. 4 indexed citations

12.

Haug, Peter J., Paul D. Clayton, Irena Tocino, et al.. (1989). Revision of Diagnostic Logic Using a Clinical Database. Medical Decision Making. 9(2). 84–90. 7 indexed citations

13.

Haug, Peter J., Homer R. Warner, Paul D. Clayton, et al.. (1987). A decision-driven system to collect the patient history. Computers and Biomedical Research. 20(2). 193–207. 10 indexed citations

14.

Frederick, Philip R., et al.. (1985). A light-guidance system to be used for CT-guided biopsy.. Radiology. 154(2). 535–536. 22 indexed citations

15.

Anderson, Jeffrey L., Hiram W. Marshall, Bruce E. Bray, et al.. (1983). A Randomized Trial of Intracoronary Streptokinase in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 308(22). 1312–1318. 411 indexed citations breakdown →

16.

Frederick, Philip R., et al.. (1982). Feeding tube for fluoroscopic placement.. Radiology. 145(3). 847–847. 8 indexed citations

17.

Frederick, Philip R., et al.. (1982). Preexamination Prediction of Radiographic Findings. Investigative Radiology. 17(3). 310–315. 1 indexed citations

18.

Frederick, Philip R., et al.. (1982). Percutaneous catheter drainage of intraabdominal fluid collections including infected biliary ducts and gallbladders. The American Journal of Surgery. 144(6). 660–667. 8 indexed citations

19.

Clayton, Paul D., et al.. (1980). A radiology reporting system based on most likely diagnoses. Computers and Biomedical Research. 13(3). 258–270. 9 indexed citations

20.

Frederick, Philip R., et al.. (1977). Longitudinal angulation in coronary arteriography: Apparatus and evaluation. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis. 3(3). 305–311. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact