Philip Peck

993 total citations
36 papers, 716 citations indexed

About

Philip Peck is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Environmental Engineering and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Peck has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 716 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 5 papers in Environmental Engineering and 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Philip Peck's work include Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (13 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (5 papers) and Global Energy and Sustainability Research (4 papers). Philip Peck is often cited by papers focused on Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (13 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (5 papers) and Global Energy and Sustainability Research (4 papers). Philip Peck collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Finland. Philip Peck's co-authors include Knud Sinding, Carl Dalhammar, Andrius Plepys, Jessika Luth Richter, Yuliya Voytenko Palgan, Julia Hansson, Elisabeth Ekener, Aron Larsson, Armi Temmes and Niina Kautto and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Renewable Energy and Resources Conservation and Recycling.

In The Last Decade

Philip Peck

34 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Peck Sweden 15 243 142 132 104 103 36 716
Matthew Brander United Kingdom 17 216 0.9× 94 0.7× 378 2.9× 169 1.6× 75 0.7× 46 1.1k
Ville Uusitalo Finland 20 166 0.7× 140 1.0× 246 1.9× 164 1.6× 40 0.4× 56 1.2k
Sirkka Koskela Finland 18 451 1.9× 190 1.3× 342 2.6× 176 1.7× 42 0.4× 42 1.2k
Philipp Grundmann Germany 21 128 0.5× 127 0.9× 127 1.0× 108 1.0× 163 1.6× 51 1.3k
Vanessa Zeller Germany 11 165 0.7× 130 0.9× 155 1.2× 182 1.8× 38 0.4× 37 697
Elisabeth Ekener Sweden 13 269 1.1× 208 1.5× 322 2.4× 272 2.6× 51 0.5× 24 929
François Vuille Switzerland 13 278 1.1× 85 0.6× 189 1.4× 101 1.0× 18 0.2× 25 935
Jonas Ammenberg Sweden 19 423 1.7× 354 2.5× 193 1.5× 135 1.3× 29 0.3× 37 1.1k
Enrico Maria Mosconi Italy 12 200 0.8× 73 0.5× 61 0.5× 68 0.7× 38 0.4× 37 638
Thomas Budde Christensen Denmark 12 302 1.2× 116 0.8× 63 0.5× 153 1.5× 23 0.2× 32 809

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Peck. The network helps show where Philip Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Peck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Peck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Peck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Peck. Philip Peck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Richter, Jessika Luth, et al.. (2021). Circular business models for electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries: An analysis of current practices of vehicle manufacturers and policies in the EU. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 172. 105658–105658. 131 indexed citations
3.
Peck, Philip & Thomas Parker. (2015). The ‘Sustainable Energy Concept’ – making sense of norms and co-evolution within a large research facility's energy strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 123. 137–154. 15 indexed citations
4.
Brogaard, Sara, et al.. (2015). Regulating a global value chain with the European Union's sustainability criteria – experiences from the Swedish liquid transport biofuel sector. Journal of Cleaner Production. 153. 580–591. 22 indexed citations
5.
Grönkvist, Stefan, et al.. (2013). POLICY INSTRUMENTS DIRECTED AT RENEWABLE TRANSPORTATION FUELS: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 5 indexed citations
6.
Kautto, Niina & Philip Peck. (2012). Regional biomass planning – Helping to realise national renewable energy goals?. Renewable Energy. 46. 23–30. 23 indexed citations
7.
Kautto, Niina & Philip Peck. (2011). From optional BAPs to obligatory NREAPs: understanding biomass planning in the EU. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 5(3). 305–316. 3 indexed citations
8.
Palgan, Yuliya Voytenko & Philip Peck. (2011). Organisational frameworks for straw-based energy systems in Sweden and Denmark. Biomass and Bioenergy. 38. 34–48. 39 indexed citations
9.
Peck, Philip, Göran Berndes, & Bo Hektor. (2011). Mobilising Global Bioenergy Supply Chains: Keys to unlocking the potential of bioenergy. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
10.
Peck, Philip. (2011). Background Study on a Global Initiative on Mining for Sustainability (GIMS): Summary report. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
11.
Kautto, Niina, Antti Arasto, Jos Sijm, & Philip Peck. (2011). Interaction of the EU ETS and national climate policy instruments – Impact on biomass use. Biomass and Bioenergy. 38. 117–127. 29 indexed citations
12.
Palgan, Yuliya Voytenko & Philip Peck. (2009). Agro-biomass frameworks for organisation in southern Sweden. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
13.
Kamm, Birgit, Klaus Menrad, Philip Peck, et al.. (2009). Assessment of BIOrefinery concepts and the implications for agricultural and forestry POLicy : Deliverable 7.6 : BIOPOL Final report. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2 indexed citations
14.
Peck, Philip, et al.. (2009). Risk and reduction of risk in short rotation coppice cropping. Lund University Publications (Lund University).
15.
Peck, Philip, et al.. (2009). Examining understanding, acceptance, and support for the biorefinery concept among EU policy‐makers. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 3(3). 361–383. 25 indexed citations
16.
Peck, Philip & Knud Sinding. (2009). Financial assurance and mine closure: Stakeholder expectations and effects on operating decisions. Resources Policy. 34(4). 227–233. 32 indexed citations
17.
Peck, Philip & Kes McCormick. (2008). Expanding Bioenergy in Europe. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
18.
Strupeit, Lars & Philip Peck. (2008). Developing Emission Scenarios to aid Air Pollution Prevention and Control. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
19.
Peck, Philip & Kes McCormick. (2007). Mainstreaming Bioenergy Systems: Parameters of Breaking Dependence on Fossil Fuels by 2020. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
20.
Peck, Philip & Knud Sinding. (2001). Environmental self-reporting. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 9(6). 10–14. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026