Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates
1996628 citationsWalter D. Koenig, Dirk Van Vuren et al.Trends in Ecology & Evolutionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Philip N. Hooge
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip N. Hooge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip N. Hooge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip N. Hooge more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip N. Hooge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip N. Hooge. The network helps show where Philip N. Hooge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip N. Hooge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip N. Hooge.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip N. Hooge based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philip N. Hooge. Philip N. Hooge is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Landres, Peter, et al.. (2016). Mapping wilderness character in Denali National Park and Preserve: Final report.2 indexed citations
Carlson, Paul R., Philip N. Hooge, & Guy R. Cochrane. (2005). Discovery of 100-160-year-old iceberg gouges and their relation to halibut habitat in Glacier Bay, Alaska. 41. 235–243.4 indexed citations
4.
Etherington, Lisa L., et al.. (2004). Factors affecting seasonal and regional patterns of surface water oceanographic properties within a fjord estuarine system: Glacier Bay, AK.4 indexed citations
5.
Hooge, Philip N., et al.. (2004). Seafloor habitat mapping and classification in Glacier Bay, Alaska: Phase 1 & 2 1996-2004.2 indexed citations
6.
Robards, Martin D., Gary S. Drew, John F. Piatt, et al.. (2003). Ecology of selected marine communities in Glacier Bay: Zooplankton, forage fish, seabirds and marine mammals.28 indexed citations
Hooge, Philip N., et al.. (1998). Pacific halibut in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. 712–714.3 indexed citations
16.
Koenig, Walter D., Dirk Van Vuren, & Philip N. Hooge. (1996). Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 11(12). 514–517.628 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Hooge, Philip N., et al.. (1995). Prey preference of Pacific halibut ( Hippoglossus stenolepis ) in Glacier Bay National Park. 209–214.1 indexed citations
18.
Hooge, Philip N., et al.. (1995). Habitat correlates of Pacific halibut and other groundfish species in Glacier Bay National Park.3 indexed citations
19.
Koenig, Walter D., Mark T. Stanback, Philip N. Hooge, & Ronald L. Mumme. (1991). Distress Calls in the Acorn Woodpecker. Ornithological Applications. 93(3). 637–643.40 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.