Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Wettability Determination and Its Effect on Recovery Efficiency
1969387 citationsErle C. Donaldson, R.D. Thomas et al.Society of Petroleum Engineers Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Lorenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Lorenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Lorenz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Lorenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Lorenz. The network helps show where Philip Lorenz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Lorenz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Lorenz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Lorenz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Lorenz. Philip Lorenz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Croissant, Aurel, David Kuehn, & Philip Lorenz. (2012). Breaking with the Past? Civil-Military Relations in the Emerging Democracies of East Asia. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa).7 indexed citations
8.
Jacob, Daniela & Philip Lorenz. (2009). Sensitivity of future trends and variability in the hydrological cycle to different IPCC SRES emission scenarios - a case study for the Baltic Sea Region. Boreal environment research. 14(1). 100–113.3 indexed citations
9.
Jacob, Daniela, Lola Kotova, Philip Lorenz, Christopher Moseley, & Susanne P. Pfeifer. (2008). Regional climate modeling activities in relation to the CLAVIER project. Max Planck Digital Library. 112. 141–153.9 indexed citations
Lorenz, Philip & Stephanie L. Brock. (1987). Surfactant and cosurfactant properties of mixed and polysulfonated surfactant by phase volume measurements: Topical report. [Hexane to dodecane]. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Lorenz, Philip, Erie C. Donaldson, & R.D. Thomas. (1974). Use of centrifugal measurements of wettability to predict oil recovery. International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security. 7873.19 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, R.D. & Philip Lorenz. (1970). Use of centrifugal separation to investigate how kerogen is bound to the minerals in oil shale. International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security. 7378.4 indexed citations
19.
Donaldson, Erle C., R.D. Thomas, & Philip Lorenz. (1969). Wettability Determination and Its Effect on Recovery Efficiency. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. 9(1). 13–20.387 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.