Philip King

27 total papers · 623 total citations
13 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

Philip King is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip King has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Materials Chemistry and 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Philip King's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (7 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2 papers). Philip King is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (7 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2 papers). Philip King collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Philip King's co-authors include M. Murakami, R. T. Young, G. J. Clark, C. W. White, W. H. Christie, J. Narayan, Stefan Krämer, C. E. Bush, R. C. Isler and P.H. Edmonds and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

Philip King

12 papers receiving 346 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Philip King	182	174	131	116	78	13	392
G.A. Campbell	183 1.0×	170 1.0×	231 1.8×	71 0.6×	72 0.9×	16	405
M. Wisse	165 0.9×	87 0.5×	201 1.5×	62 0.5×	40 0.5×	17	347
W. J. Waganaar	185 1.0×	143 0.8×	103 0.8×	160 1.4×	36 0.5×	29	408
A. Grossman	223 1.2×	97 0.6×	192 1.5×	39 0.3×	68 0.9×	28	357
W.K. Leung	169 0.9×	105 0.6×	285 2.2×	111 1.0×	46 0.6×	20	388
H. Hartwig	238 1.3×	130 0.7×	136 1.0×	33 0.3×	86 1.1×	24	396
J.C.M. de Haas	274 1.5×	108 0.6×	130 1.0×	25 0.2×	84 1.1×	17	380
Katsuhiko Mutoh	90 0.5×	127 0.7×	207 1.6×	63 0.5×	26 0.3×	16	344
C.M. Samuell	292 1.6×	144 0.8×	266 2.0×	28 0.2×	100 1.3×	27	436
C. T. Chang	128 0.7×	53 0.3×	50 0.4×	174 1.5×	77 1.0×	24	439

Countries citing papers authored by Philip King

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip King

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip King. The network helps show where Philip King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip King. Philip King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact