Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A survey of wormhole routing techniques in direct networks
1993975 citationsLionel M. Ni, Philip K. McKinleyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Philip K. McKinley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip K. McKinley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip K. McKinley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip K. McKinley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip K. McKinley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip K. McKinley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip K. McKinley. The network helps show where Philip K. McKinley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip K. McKinley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip K. McKinley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip K. McKinley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philip K. McKinley. Philip K. McKinley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cheng, Betty H. C., et al.. (2020). AC-ROS. 102–113.18 indexed citations
Zaman, Luis, et al.. (2010). Social structure and the maintenance of biodiversity. Artificial Life. 461–468.2 indexed citations
6.
McKinley, Philip K. & Benjamin E. Beckmann. (2010). Evolving cooperative, energy-conserving, agent-base systems.1 indexed citations
7.
McKinley, Philip K., et al.. (2008). Dynamis: Dynamic overlay service composition for distributed stream processing. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 881–886.11 indexed citations
8.
Zhang, Ji, et al.. (2004). Enabling Safe Dynamic Component-Based Software Adaptation.. 194–211.1 indexed citations
9.
McKinley, Philip K., et al.. (1997). Performance Evaluation of Large-Scale Parallel Clustering in NOW Environments.. PPSC.2 indexed citations
Huang, Yih & Philip K. McKinley. (1996). A Lightweight Protocol for Multipoint Connections under Link-State Routing.. International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 335–343.2 indexed citations
12.
McKinley, Philip K., et al.. (1995). A Parallel Algorithm for the Singular Value Problem in Bidiagonal Matrices.. PPSC. 62–67.1 indexed citations
McKinley, Philip K., et al.. (1992). Efficient implementation of distributed barrier synchronization in wormhole-routed hypercube multicomputers. International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.2 indexed citations
19.
Lin, Xiaola, Philip K. McKinley, & Lionel M. Ni. (1991). Performance evaluation of multicast wormhole routing in 2D-mesh multicomputers. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). 435–442.33 indexed citations
20.
McKinley, Philip K.. (1988). Multicast routing in spanning bus hypercubes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing. 204–211.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.