Philip Hurst

81 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Philip Hurst
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Applied Psychology 157
  • Reproductive Medicine 191
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 219
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 263
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 104
Replace G F Read with:
G F Read United Kingdom
R Stupnicki Poland
Donald R. Koritnik United States
Signe Altmäe Spain
Karen L. Herbst United States
Firyal S. Khan‐Dawood United States
M. Louise Hull Australia
Toshiaki Tachibana Japan
Jing Hua Zhao United Kingdom
R E Frisch United States
Philip Hurst relative to G F Read United Kingdom G F Read's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
G F Read · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Hurst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Hurst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Hurst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Hurst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Hurst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Hurst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Hurst. The network helps show where Philip Hurst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Hurst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Hurst Line = papers co-authored together Philip Hurst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984164
2 201992
3 200770
4 201865
5 201946
6 201741
7 202037
8 202037
9 201936
10 199635
11
An ultrastructural study of preimplantation uterine embryos of the rhesus monkey.
197834
12 198133
13 200230
14 202129
15 199128
16 199728
17 201828
18 199524
19 201922
20 202121

About Philip Hurst

Philip Hurst is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Immunology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doping in Sports (23 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (18 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (13 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (12 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (11 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (10 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (157 citations), Reproductive Medicine (191 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (219 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (263 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (104 citations). Philip Hurst has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Ring, Maria Kavussanu, Chris Beedie, A. Foad, K. P. McNatty, D. A. Coleman, Helen Nicholson, Maree Gould, Peter P. Eckstein and S. Lun. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction, Psychology of sport and exercise, European Journal of Sport Science, Journal of Sports Sciences and Contraception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact