Philip G. Jessop
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 0.01%
- Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis 68
- Catalysis top 0.05%
- Ionic liquids properties and applications 40
- Inorganic Chemistry top 0.2%
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 23
- Organic Chemistry top 0.1%
- Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization 28
- Surfactants and Colloidal Systems 20
-
- Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics 29
-
- Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies 25
- Membrane Separation and Gas Transport 24
- Co-authors
- Ryōji NoyoriTakao IkariyaMichael F. CunninghamDavid J. HeldebrantCharles A. EckertCharles L. LiottaLam PhanRobert H. Morris
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Philip G. Jessop
228 papers receiving 17.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Process Chemistry and Technology 5.7k
- Catalysis 4.9k
- Inorganic Chemistry 3.5k
- Organic Chemistry 6.3k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 3.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Jessop
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Jessop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Jessop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Jessop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Jessop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Jessop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Jessop. The network helps show where Philip G. Jessop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip G. Jessop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 143 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 15 | Searching for green solventsbreakdown → | 2011 | 845 |
| 16 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 68 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 32 | |
| 19 | Chemical synthesis using supercritical fluidsbreakdown → | 1999 | 515 |
| 20 | 1999 | 13 |
About Philip G. Jessop
Philip G. Jessop is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Catalysis and Organic Chemistry, having authored 231 papers that have together received 18.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (68 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (40 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (29 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (28 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (25 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (24 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (23 papers) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (5.7k citations), Catalysis (4.9k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (3.5k citations). Philip G. Jessop has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ryōji Noyori, Takao Ikariya, Michael F. Cunningham, David J. Heldebrant, Charles A. Eckert, Charles L. Liotta, Lam Phan, Robert H. Morris, Walter Leitner and Sean M. Mercer. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.