Philip Denniff

1.3k total citations
11 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Philip Denniff is a scholar working on Immunology, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Denniff has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Immunology, 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Philip Denniff's work include Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (11 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers) and Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (2 papers). Philip Denniff is often cited by papers focused on Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (11 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers) and Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (2 papers). Philip Denniff collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Philip Denniff's co-authors include Neil Spooner, Paul Abu‐Rabie, Babur Z. Chowdhry, Frank S. Pullen, Simon Parry, James Rudge, Patricia Zane, Qin Ji, Valérie Boutet and Karen Woods and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Bioanalysis.

In The Last Decade

Philip Denniff

11 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Denniff United Kingdom 10 847 326 249 211 183 11 1.1k
Sara Capiau Belgium 10 657 0.8× 177 0.5× 183 0.7× 170 0.8× 218 1.2× 13 930
Matthew Barfield United Kingdom 11 394 0.5× 147 0.5× 107 0.4× 103 0.5× 75 0.4× 29 521
Barbara W Adam United States 11 347 0.4× 102 0.3× 96 0.4× 273 1.3× 122 0.7× 16 988
Pieter De Kesel Belgium 13 282 0.3× 100 0.3× 80 0.3× 84 0.4× 146 0.8× 18 556
K. Hoogtanders Netherlands 11 298 0.4× 55 0.2× 168 0.7× 42 0.2× 104 0.6× 15 532
Chester L. Bowen United States 13 200 0.2× 115 0.4× 60 0.2× 224 1.1× 36 0.2× 27 593
Susan Fowles United Kingdom 11 200 0.2× 65 0.2× 152 0.6× 136 0.6× 37 0.2× 15 587
Carol Gleason United States 16 167 0.2× 29 0.1× 372 1.5× 242 1.1× 45 0.2× 43 920
Nicolas Hohmann Germany 16 118 0.1× 62 0.2× 123 0.5× 185 0.9× 30 0.2× 36 1.0k
Daniela Ombrone Italy 12 112 0.1× 22 0.1× 109 0.4× 128 0.6× 25 0.1× 16 433

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Denniff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Denniff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Denniff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Denniff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Denniff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Denniff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Denniff. The network helps show where Philip Denniff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Denniff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Denniff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Denniff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Denniff. Philip Denniff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Abu‐Rabie, Paul, Neil Spooner, James Rudge, et al.. (2019). Validation of Methods for Determining Pediatric Midazolam Using Wet Whole Blood and Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling. Bioanalysis. 11(19). 1737–1754. 15 indexed citations
2.
Abu‐Rabie, Paul, Philip Denniff, Neil Spooner, Babur Z. Chowdhry, & Frank S. Pullen. (2015). Investigation of Different Approaches to Incorporating Internal Standard in DBS Quantitative Bioanalytical Workflows and Their Effect on Nullifying Hematocrit-Based Assay Bias. Analytical Chemistry. 87(9). 4996–5003. 89 indexed citations
3.
Denniff, Philip, et al.. (2015). Quantitative bioanalysis of paracetamol in rats using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS). Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 108. 61–69. 65 indexed citations
4.
Denniff, Philip, et al.. (2014). Bioanalysis Zone: DBS Survey Results. Bioanalysis. 6(3). 287–291. 10 indexed citations
5.
Denniff, Philip & Neil Spooner. (2014). Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling: A Dried Sample Collection Technique for Quantitative Bioanalysis. Analytical Chemistry. 86(16). 8489–8495. 330 indexed citations
6.
Spooner, Neil, Philip Denniff, Ronald de Vries, et al.. (2014). A Device for Dried Blood Microsampling in Quantitative Bioanalysis: Overcoming The Issues Associated Blood Hematocrit. Bioanalysis. 7(6). 653–659. 184 indexed citations
8.
Denniff, Philip, et al.. (2013). Effect of Ambient Humidity on The Rate at Which Blood Spots Dry and The Size of The Spot Produced. Bioanalysis. 5(15). 1863–1871. 11 indexed citations
9.
Abu‐Rabie, Paul, et al.. (2011). Method of Applying Internal Standard to Dried Matrix Spot Samples for Use in Quantitative Bioanalysis. Analytical Chemistry. 83(22). 8779–8786. 62 indexed citations
10.
Denniff, Philip & Neil Spooner. (2010). The Effect of Hematocrit on Assay Bias When Using DBS Samples for The Quantitative Bioanalysis of Drugs. Bioanalysis. 2(8). 1385–1395. 258 indexed citations
11.
Denniff, Philip & Neil Spooner. (2010). Effect of Storage Conditions on The Weight and Appearance of Dried Blood Spot Samples on Various Cellulose-Based Substrates. Bioanalysis. 2(11). 1817–1822. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026