Philip Battle

921 citations
56 papers · 674 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Battle

54 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

Philip Battle
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 24
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 519
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 417
  • Instrumentation 21
  • Biophysics 31
Replace Paul Narum with:
Paul Narum United States
J.-L. Le Gouët France
Ioana Craiciu United States
Jeff Z. Salvail Canada
Henk F. Arnoldus United States
David Bitauld Italy
M. M. Fejer United States
T. Grange France
M. C. Teich United States
Adriana Lita United States
Philip Battle relative to Paul Narum United States Paul Narum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Paul Narum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Battle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Battle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Battle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Battle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Battle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Battle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Battle. The network helps show where Philip Battle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Battle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Battle Line = papers co-authored together Philip Battle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007133
2 200946
3 201032
4 200332
5 198727
6 200923
7 199321
8 200121
9 200620
10 199620
11 201019
12 198718
13 201316
14 201415
15 199115
16 201215
17 200914
18 201514
19 200413
20 199813

About Philip Battle

Philip Battle is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Spectroscopy and Biophysics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (29 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (23 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (18 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (10 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (9 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (8 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (7 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (24 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (519 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (417 citations), Instrumentation (21 citations) and Biophysics (31 citations). Philip Battle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tony Roberts, J. L. Carlsten, Edik U. Rafailov, S. M. Spillane, M. Munro, Marco Fiorentino, Raymond G. Beausoleil, Franco N. C. Wong, Tian Zhong and Peter J. Collings. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Physical Review A, Optics Express, Physical Review Letters and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact